2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b07120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on “Is the Antiresonance in Meta-Contacted Benzene Due to the Destructive Superposition of Waves Traveling Two Different Routes around the Benzene Ring”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the interpretation of destructive quantum interference through the pristine benzene ring, the relationship G 13 ( E ) ∝ cos k = 0 at k ( E ) = π/2 is derived in ref (this derivation is described in eqs 9, 12, 29, 30, and 34 of ref ). We agree with the authors of ref that the analysis in ref showing G 13 ( E ) ∝ cos k and T ( E ) ∝ |1 + e ikL | 2 indeed gives 0 when k = π/2 and L = 2. Therefore, we are not saying that G meta = 0 as derived by ref is incorrect since the meta -case does indeed give zero values.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As for the interpretation of destructive quantum interference through the pristine benzene ring, the relationship G 13 ( E ) ∝ cos k = 0 at k ( E ) = π/2 is derived in ref (this derivation is described in eqs 9, 12, 29, 30, and 34 of ref ). We agree with the authors of ref that the analysis in ref showing G 13 ( E ) ∝ cos k and T ( E ) ∝ |1 + e ikL | 2 indeed gives 0 when k = π/2 and L = 2. Therefore, we are not saying that G meta = 0 as derived by ref is incorrect since the meta -case does indeed give zero values.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…The recent comment by Sykora et al on the work of Nozaki et al pointed out that the phase shifts between two independent pathways through a meta -contacted benzene calculated in Figures 4f,g of ref include erroneous shifts and that the phase shift should instead be π. This statement in ref is correct, and there was an error in the calculation of the phase shift in ref , which is discussed in more detail below.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further debate ensued. 45,46 If one wants to understand QI effects, it may also make sense to use the formalism of Feynman paths. 47 QI features might be interpreted as the consequence of the interference between electron wave-functions through different Feynman paths.…”
Section: State Of the Art In The Theory Of Qimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, they argued that the analogy between the classical double-slit experiment and QI is not correct. Further debate ensued. , …”
Section: State Of the Art In The Theory Of Qimentioning
confidence: 99%