2013
DOI: 10.1002/jgrb.50170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on “Historical perspective on seismic hazard to Hispaniola and the northeast Caribbean region” by U. ten Brink et al.

Abstract: Citation: Prentice, C. S., P. Mann, and L. R. Pen˜a (2013), Comment on "Historical perspective on seismic hazard to Hispaniola and the northeast Caribbean region" by U. ten Brink et al.,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both events are commonly ascribed to the offshore portion of the Septentrional fault, because paleoseismological studies show that no surface rupture has occurred on the onshore portion of the Septentrional fault in the central Dominican Republic in the last 800 years (Prentice et al ., ). Recent studies of historical earthquake accounts (ten Brink et al ., ; Bakun et al ., ) that have assigned historical earthquakes to the onshore strike‐slip faults are challenged by the available paleoseismological studies (Prentice et al ., ). The late Holocene slip rate of 6–12 mm a −1 for the Septentrional fault derived from paleoseismological restoration (Prentice et al ., ) agrees with the rate of 9.8 ± 2 mm a −1 computed from GPS along the Septentrional fault (Benford et al ., ; Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Both events are commonly ascribed to the offshore portion of the Septentrional fault, because paleoseismological studies show that no surface rupture has occurred on the onshore portion of the Septentrional fault in the central Dominican Republic in the last 800 years (Prentice et al ., ). Recent studies of historical earthquake accounts (ten Brink et al ., ; Bakun et al ., ) that have assigned historical earthquakes to the onshore strike‐slip faults are challenged by the available paleoseismological studies (Prentice et al ., ). The late Holocene slip rate of 6–12 mm a −1 for the Septentrional fault derived from paleoseismological restoration (Prentice et al ., ) agrees with the rate of 9.8 ± 2 mm a −1 computed from GPS along the Septentrional fault (Benford et al ., ; Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%