2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016wr019316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on “Estimation of composite hydraulic resistance in ice‐covered alluvial streams” by Ghareh Aghaji Zare et al.

Abstract: Inconsistencies between basic hydraulics and hypotheses advanced by the authors are identified. They are attributed primarily to weaknesses in the analysis of velocity measurements in the ice‐controlled flow layer and suggestions for improvement are offered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other approaches and assumptions regarding the calculation of hydraulic radii are discussed in the paper. Note that the discussant suggested the authors misinterpreted that Larsen [1969] and Beltaos et al [2012] assumed R i 5 R b in general [Beltaos, 2016]. In fact, the authors wrote that Larsen [1969] and Beltaos et al [2012] assumed that R c 5 Y t /2 (in which Y t is the total depth) not R i 5 R b .…”
Section: Definition Of Hydraulic Radii In Ice-covered Streamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches and assumptions regarding the calculation of hydraulic radii are discussed in the paper. Note that the discussant suggested the authors misinterpreted that Larsen [1969] and Beltaos et al [2012] assumed R i 5 R b in general [Beltaos, 2016]. In fact, the authors wrote that Larsen [1969] and Beltaos et al [2012] assumed that R c 5 Y t /2 (in which Y t is the total depth) not R i 5 R b .…”
Section: Definition Of Hydraulic Radii In Ice-covered Streamsmentioning
confidence: 99%