2014
DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/met086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on Comparison of Powder Dustiness Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aerosolization proceeds under turbulent conditions, whereas in the gentle tests, the airflows are larger scale and laminar. The reproducibility [59] of the method has been criticized [63] but has been defended [64]. The method involves more aggressive air flows than those typically encountered in large-scale workplace activities (however, the use of compressed air to clean contaminated worker clothing or work surfaces approximates the aerodynamic conditions of the VDT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerosolization proceeds under turbulent conditions, whereas in the gentle tests, the airflows are larger scale and laminar. The reproducibility [59] of the method has been criticized [63] but has been defended [64]. The method involves more aggressive air flows than those typically encountered in large-scale workplace activities (however, the use of compressed air to clean contaminated worker clothing or work surfaces approximates the aerodynamic conditions of the VDT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%