2014
DOI: 10.1785/0120130262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on "Advanced Seismic Analyses of the Source Characteristics of the 2006 and 2009 North Korean Nuclear Tests" by J. R. Murphy, J. L. Stevens, B. C. Kohl, and T. J. Bennett

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several other nuclear explosion models have been proposed, including Haskell (), von Seggern and Blandford (), Helmberger and Hadley (), Denny and Johnson (), and Walter and Ford (). These have different spectral shape and different depth and yield‐scaling attributes, and some concerns have been raised about the Mueller‐Murphy model (e.g., Patton & Pabian, ; Walter & Ford, ). However, the Mueller‐Murphy model remains the most comprehensively parameterized model, and as shown in the modeling here, it is very effective at representing the seismic data for reasonable parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several other nuclear explosion models have been proposed, including Haskell (), von Seggern and Blandford (), Helmberger and Hadley (), Denny and Johnson (), and Walter and Ford (). These have different spectral shape and different depth and yield‐scaling attributes, and some concerns have been raised about the Mueller‐Murphy model (e.g., Patton & Pabian, ; Walter & Ford, ). However, the Mueller‐Murphy model remains the most comprehensively parameterized model, and as shown in the modeling here, it is very effective at representing the seismic data for reasonable parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precise relative locations for the six explosions, with uncertainties on the order of a few hundred meters, have been determined by numerous seismic differential arrival time studies (e.g., Carluccio et al, ; Gibbons et al, , ; He et al, ; Myers et al, ; Murphy et al, ; Selby, ; Wang et al, ; Wen & Long, ; Yao et al, ; Zhang & Wen, ; Zhao et al, ; Zhao, Xie, He, et al, ). Absolute locations are much more difficult to resolve, and various strategies have been used to place the suite of precise relative locations in absolute position with respect to the source region topography, locations of tunnel portals, and/or deformation features on the surface inferred from InSAR or satellite photography (e.g., Murphy et al, ; Myers et al, ; Pabian & Coblentz, ; Pabian & Hecker, ; Patton & Pabian, ; Wei, ), with recent results having less than ~0.5‐km variations. The absence of collapse craters for all events complicates the absolute location process and indicates that burial depths for most events significantly exceed what is required for containment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saikia (2017) recently presented an analytic formulation of the time-domain far-field reduced velocity potential (RVP) that is convenient for broadband waveform modeling. There are uncertainties in the scaling behavior for the MM model (e.g., Patton & Pabian, 2014), as is true for all source models. Our results are coupled to that particular model.…”
Section: Data and Modeling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 This article examines what information from the surface topography can be used to understand variations in the geologic properties that influence coupling characteristics that could inform yield estimations for clandestine tests. The geology at the test site clearly has an influence on the release of radionuclides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%