2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2012.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commensuration and styles of reasoning: Venice, cost–benefit, and the defence of place

Abstract: If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
40
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we see the importance of the accommodation of different perspectives and recognition by actors that the proposed solution (in our case the QF), although not perfect, provides a fitting answer to a problem of common interest (c.f. Huault & Rainelli-Weiss, 2011;Samiolo, 2012).…”
Section: 'Imperfection' and The Potential For 'Productive Friction'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we see the importance of the accommodation of different perspectives and recognition by actors that the proposed solution (in our case the QF), although not perfect, provides a fitting answer to a problem of common interest (c.f. Huault & Rainelli-Weiss, 2011;Samiolo, 2012).…”
Section: 'Imperfection' and The Potential For 'Productive Friction'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within standardization decisions are linked to professional and replicable methodologies of verification, which are seen to transcend individual subjectivity, and deemed universally applicable (Porter, 1992). In this sense, the calculative infrastructure of corporate citizenship can support the aspiration to 'escape from perspective' and obtain a 'view from nowhere' of what corporate accountability is about (Daston, 1992;Jasanoff, 2005;Samiolo, 2012). The notion of commensuration can be aptly mobilized here to indicate the process whereby different qualities are measured with a single standard or unit, to derive a common metric through a series of aggregations (Espeland and Stevens, 1998;Espeland, 2000).…”
Section: Conclusion: On Corporate Citizenship As Commensurationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The notion of commensuration can be aptly mobilized here to indicate the process whereby different qualities are measured with a single standard or unit, to derive a common metric through a series of aggregations (Espeland and Stevens, 1998;Espeland, 2000). In this way new links are forged between things previously separated, but at the same time distance is created by the mediation and abstraction imposed by numbers (Espeland, 1998;Samiolo, 2012). A fundamental exercise of commensurability is what allows the making of corporate responsibility manageable: the vast array of qualities that make up the idea of corporate citizenship becomes expressed according to a common metric.…”
Section: Conclusion: On Corporate Citizenship As Commensurationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To understand such assemblages means analysing the local and the non-local, the macro and the micro, and how they come to be connected (see e.g. Kurunmäki & Miller, 2011;Mennicken, 2008;Samiolo, 2012). It means paying attention to the emergence and stabilization of novel assemblages, such as the recent and still ongoing attempts to economize the entire social sphere (see also Çalışkan & Callon, 2009Çalışkan & Callon, , 2010.…”
Section: The Foucault Effect In Organization Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the quality of health care or the decency of imprisonment) into quantities, through devices such as patient satisfaction questionnaires, rankings (of schools, universities, care homes, prisons, and so on), balanced scorecards, and much else besides. These, in turn, can then be subjected to a variety of further calculations and comparisons through audits and other forms of more or less public assessment (Espeland & Sauder, 2007;Kurunmäki & Miller, 2006;Mennicken, 2010Mennicken, , 2013Power, 1997;Samiolo, 2012).…”
Section: Governing and Calculatingmentioning
confidence: 99%