Command and Control of Joint Air Operations in the Pacific: Methods for Comparing and Contrasting Alternative Concepts

Abstract

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest.RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1865Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2018 RAND CorporationR® is a registered trademark.iii PrefaceThe anti-access and area-denial capabilities of near-peer competitors and the vast geographic expanse of the Pacific pose potential challenges for command and control (C2) of joint air operations in the region. Alternative concepts for operational-level C2 may help overcome these challenges. 1 For instance, some alternative concepts reduce the geographic challenges by defining distinct joint operational areas and tailoring the roles, rules, responsibilities, and authorities for C2 within each. However, a command-and-control concept optimized for one type of operation, such as humanitarian assistance and disaster relief, may not be appropriate for another type of operation, such as a major war with a near-peer competitor. This report describes methods for comparing and contrasting alternative concepts for C2 of joint air operations in the Pacific. It then applies these methods to a selection of alternative C2 concepts in a series of Pacific scenarios.This project, titled "The Future of Command and

Distributed Operations in a Contested Environment: Implications for USAF Force Presentation

“…USINDOPACOM field exercise will include disrupted communications for the first time. For a brief discussion of Unified Engagement, 2014, see Alkire et al, 2018, p. 9. 50 Warburton, 2017.…”

An algorithm for determining whether a ship's leg is under air threat

“…To ensure the safety of navigation, the route should try to avoid the air threat range of the enemy's airport, shore-to-ship missiles, and other threat sources. If it is impossible to completely avoid it, it is necessary to determine whether each segment of the route is subject to the enemy's air threat [1][2][3][4] .…”