2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3490080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coming to College Hungry: How Food Insecurity Relates to Amotivation, Stress, Engagement, and First-Semester Performance in a 4-Year University

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an occasion provides a chance to develop an intake survey to gain additional information on these students. Given that students’ non-cognitive attributes (Bowman et al., 2019) and basic needs (Collier, Fitzpatrick, Brehm, et al., 2020) influence students’ college-related experience and performance, an intake survey should capture such information– especially when considering that prior descriptive research illustrated that Kalamazoo Promise students experience food (and housing) insecurity (Collier, Parnther, et al., 2019) at higher rates than the average student enrolled at the same institution (Collier, Fitzpatrick, Brehm, & Archer, 2019) and when compared to national findings (Baker-Smith et al., 2020). Collecting this data would likely bolster the capabilities of institutional staff to respond to these students’ needs and provide additional power to models predicting persistence towards degree upon reenrollment (notably for certificate/2-year degree attainment).…”
Section: Implications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an occasion provides a chance to develop an intake survey to gain additional information on these students. Given that students’ non-cognitive attributes (Bowman et al., 2019) and basic needs (Collier, Fitzpatrick, Brehm, et al., 2020) influence students’ college-related experience and performance, an intake survey should capture such information– especially when considering that prior descriptive research illustrated that Kalamazoo Promise students experience food (and housing) insecurity (Collier, Parnther, et al., 2019) at higher rates than the average student enrolled at the same institution (Collier, Fitzpatrick, Brehm, & Archer, 2019) and when compared to national findings (Baker-Smith et al., 2020). Collecting this data would likely bolster the capabilities of institutional staff to respond to these students’ needs and provide additional power to models predicting persistence towards degree upon reenrollment (notably for certificate/2-year degree attainment).…”
Section: Implications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this study’s site institution, a 2016 survey capturing nearly 30% of enrolled KPromise students illustrated that 53% were Pell eligible, 53% experienced any housing insecurity, 15% had experiences with homelessness, and 70% reported experiencing some level of food insecurity (Collier, Parnther, et al., 2019). For comparison, for first-time full-time undergraduates at the site institution, 37% were Pell eligible and 42% of first-year students overall reported food insecurity, considerably lower than the rate for KPromise scholars (Collier, Fitzpatrick, et al., 2019). Related to this study, for the 09-12 cohorts, 36% of first-time fulltime undergraduates were Pell eligible (U.S. Department of Education, 2019).…”
Section: Proliferation Of Promises and The Kalamazoo Promisementioning
confidence: 95%
“…These multiple mechanisms inherent in the program design and implementation are important because a growing body of scholarship indicates that students with food insecurity feel isolated, shameful, or that they do not belong on campus (Collier et al, 2021; Henry, 2020) and are more likely to report depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation (Broton, Mohebali, & Lingo, 2022; Goldrick-Rab et al, 2022). Poor mental health and belonging are important indicators of students’ academic success and persistence that may help explain the reported associations between food insecurity and higher risk of withdrawing from courses, inconsistent enrollment patterns, and lower odds of attainment (Balzer Carr & London, 2020; Meza et al, 2019; Stebleton et al, 2020; Wolfson et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%