“…The development of metabarcoding provides new opportunities to accelerate studies on metacommunity structure across underexplored fractions of biodiversity and greatly increases their taxonomic resolution (Arribas, Andújar, Salces-Castellano, Emerson, & Vogler, 2021b;Bush et al, 2020;Martin et al, 2021;Zinger et al, 2019). Recent advances in field, laboratory and bioinformatic protocols for whole organism community DNA (wocDNA, Creedy et al, 2021) metabarcoding have led to improvements in both the efficiency for the generation of such high-resolution taxonomic inventories (Arribas, Andújar, Hopkins, Shepherd, & Vogler, 2016;Elbrecht, Vamos, Steinke, & Leese, 2018), and the reliability of α and β diversity estimates (Andújar et al, 2018;Creedy, Ng, & Vogler et al, 2019). New bioinformatic tools for the removal of noise generated by amplification and sequencing errors (e.g., Callahan et al, 2016;Edgar, 2016) and the filtering of spurious sequences resulting from co-amplification of nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes (Andújar et al, 2021) allow to move beyond classical OTU (Operational Taxonomic Unit) clustering and define haplotype-level entities, or Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs; Callahan, McMurdie, & Holmes, 2017).…”