2015
DOI: 10.1037/ser0000020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coming home: A prospective study of family reintegration following deployment to a war zone.

Abstract: The consequences of deployment extend beyond the service member to impact the entire family. The current investigation evaluated the unique challenges of family reintegration for partnered service members using a prospective design. In total, 76 partnered service members who deployed on a year-long, high-risk mission to Iraq were assessed across the entirety of the deployment cycle, i.e., pre-, during, and postdeployment. At follow-up, nearly 1 in 5 partnered service members reported moderate to severe difficu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approximately half of US service members are married, equating to 1.1 million military spouses (Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC), ). These spouses face a multitude of stressors, particularly during their partner's deployment, including worrying about their partner's safety, caring for children with reduced support, and re‐adjusting when their partner returns (Balderrama‐Durbin et al., ; de Burgh, White, Fear, & Iversen, ). In contrast to the more extensively studied psychological outcomes of service members and veterans, the impact of war on military spouses has received comparatively little attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately half of US service members are married, equating to 1.1 million military spouses (Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC), ). These spouses face a multitude of stressors, particularly during their partner's deployment, including worrying about their partner's safety, caring for children with reduced support, and re‐adjusting when their partner returns (Balderrama‐Durbin et al., ; de Burgh, White, Fear, & Iversen, ). In contrast to the more extensively studied psychological outcomes of service members and veterans, the impact of war on military spouses has received comparatively little attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models contained five predictors, all treated as fixed effects: (a) the linear effect of time across the study, with the intercept (Time 0) designated as the first time we measured relationship changes at Wave 2; (b) the quadratic effect of time represented as time-squared (time 2 ); (c) role (1 = returning service member , −1 = at-home partner ); and (d) two cross-level interactions (Role × Time and Role × Time 2 ). Based on prior research (Balderrama-Durbin et al, 2015; Meadows et al, 2016), we also controlled for four covariates as fixed effects: (a) relationship satisfaction; (b) marital status (0 = married , 1 = dating, engaged, or civil union ); (c) deployment mission (0 = combat , 1 = peacekeeping, relief, training, or other ); and (d) first deployment (0 = no , 1 = yes ). 3…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, to facilitate the generalizability of our results, we enrolled a nationwide sample from all military branches and regions of the country. Third, to address calls to track relationship changes sequentially (e.g., Balderrama-Durbin et al, 2015; Knobloch & Theiss, 2012), we utilized a Wave 1 assessment of demographic information at reunion, followed by seven monthly assessments of relationship changes beginning 30 days after homecoming (7,387 total observations). In what follows, we describe the implications of our data, the limitations of our study, and directions for future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Primary interpersonal variables found to be antecedent to reintegration problems include relational difficulties prior to deployment (Cigrang et al, 2014), infrequent communication during and after deployment (Rea, Behnke, Huff, & Allen, 2015), and a lack of shared commitment to a military lifestyle (Britt, Adler, & Castro, 2006). Conversely, spouses who have enjoyed a mutually satisfying predeployment relationship, who communicate frequently during the deployment period, and who share a commitment to being a part of the military culture have shown to be generally more resilient to the challenges of postdeployment reintegration (Balderrama-Durbin et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%