2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04906-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coming back to the normal clinic: how has COVID-19 changed us?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only 44% of the respondents believe that the work in their facility will start to normalise from 2021. This condition is similar to the situation in other countries in Europe [16,17]. Public health analysts are indicated that this state could not change to the pre-COVID era [18].…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only 44% of the respondents believe that the work in their facility will start to normalise from 2021. This condition is similar to the situation in other countries in Europe [16,17]. Public health analysts are indicated that this state could not change to the pre-COVID era [18].…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Questions about training were also added to the survey, where the main assumption was to check how respondents assess the effects of the pandemic on the level of training and whether they are willing to use online forms of learning. The questionnaire was divided into several main domains (5): Preparedness (questions 7-15); Training (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26); Stress (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33); Reduction (34-41); Awareness (42-45+49,50) and single questions-Stress level and Financial problems. Aiming at minimizing the prospect of suggested answers, in blocks 1., 2., 3. and 5. that focused on a subjective participants' evaluation, a Likert-like scale was applied (from 1 to 5), in which the surveyed could choose to what degree they fully did not agree (1) or did fully agree (5) with a given thesis (only block 3., concerning the stress levels, a 1-10 graded scale was applied, in which 1 indicated significantly low and 10 significantly high levels of the studied parameter).…”
Section: Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%