Virtual Screening 2012
DOI: 10.5772/36690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CoMFA/CoMSIA and Pharmacophore Modelling as a Powerful Tools for Efficient Virtual Screening: Application to Anti-Leishmanial Betulin Derivatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the CoMSIA method has been developed to make usage of hydrophobic fields in addition to the electrostatic fields. It can improve these inherent deficiencies arising from the CoMFA method [56]. Accordingly, there is 27.1% of hydrophobic field in addition to steric field (10.4%) in the generated CoMSIA model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the CoMSIA method has been developed to make usage of hydrophobic fields in addition to the electrostatic fields. It can improve these inherent deficiencies arising from the CoMFA method [56]. Accordingly, there is 27.1% of hydrophobic field in addition to steric field (10.4%) in the generated CoMSIA model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D QSAR CoMFA and CoMSIA methodologies have emerged as fundamental tools for design and molecular optimization of drug candidates targeting GPCRs. The CoMFA methodology provides information of whether differences in steric (Lennard-Jones potential functions) and electrostatic components (Coulomb potential functions) for field calculation of a training set of molecules in a given alignment can be correlated with differences in biological/pharmacological activity [502-504]. A comparable 3D QSAR-based methodology, CoMSIA, was developed based on arbitrary descriptors named similarity indices.…”
Section: G-protein-coupled Receptors As Thera-peutic Targets For Parkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying an appropriate statistical method for regression analysis, usually by PLS, the 3D-QSAR model is constructed to describe the variation of biological/pharmacological activity with the variation of CoMFA/CoMSIA interaction fields and the predictive ability of 3D-QSAR model is corroborated by cross-validation and prediction of activity of test set. The generated CoMFA/CoMSIA is typically represented as color-coded contoured 3D maps, which displays specific volumes of space where the magnitudes of steric, electrostatic, hydrophobic, hydrogen bond acceptor, and hydrogen bond donor parameters are positively or negatively correlated with the pharmacological activity [484][485][486][487]. This type of graphical representation can be presumed as a model of the binding site in which a training set of ligands is supposed to interact.…”
Section: Application Of Ligand-based and Pharmacophore-based Design Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The external validation consists in the prediction of biological/pharmacological activity using a group of ligands that are not included in the training set (test set) and the same descriptor variables are employed in the generation of the QSAR model[483].The 3D QSAR CoMFA and CoMSIA methodologies have emerged as fundamental tools for design and molecular optimization of drug candidates targeting GPCRs. The CoMFA methodology provides information of whether differences in steric (Lennard-Jones potential functions) and electrostatic components (Coulomb potential functions) for field calculation of a training set of molecules in a given alignment can be correlated with differences in biological/pharmacological activity[484][485][486]. A comparable 3D QSAR-based methodology, CoMSIA, was developed based on arbitrary descriptors named similarity indices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%