2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2008.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CoMFA and docking studies of 2-phenylindole derivatives with anticancer activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The steric and electrostatic energies from CoMFA and CoMSIA were quite effective for understanding important non-covalent and shape-dependent interactions between small compounds and their target protein because CoMFA and CoMSIA models are derived based upon the assumption that 3D structures of input compounds are aligned according to their biologically active conformations when compounds bind to and interact with their target protein [16,17]. Although there is no particular alignment method which produces biologically active conformations of compounds, plausible bioactive conformations of compounds can be produced by several different alignment methods: ligandbased, pharmacophore-based, and receptor-guided.…”
Section: Alignments For Comfa and Comsiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The steric and electrostatic energies from CoMFA and CoMSIA were quite effective for understanding important non-covalent and shape-dependent interactions between small compounds and their target protein because CoMFA and CoMSIA models are derived based upon the assumption that 3D structures of input compounds are aligned according to their biologically active conformations when compounds bind to and interact with their target protein [16,17]. Although there is no particular alignment method which produces biologically active conformations of compounds, plausible bioactive conformations of compounds can be produced by several different alignment methods: ligandbased, pharmacophore-based, and receptor-guided.…”
Section: Alignments For Comfa and Comsiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also correlated with a previous comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) study of 2-phenylindole derivatives by Liao and co-workers. 33 On the other hand, the presence of partially negative charged functions is suitable around the R position ( Figure 1) as suggested by the macro red contours of the CoMSIA contour maps ( Figure 6). This result seemed to signify the importance of the para-methoxy substitution on the phenyl ring of the R position and matching with the previous study.…”
Section: -39 Etc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result seemed to signify the importance of the para-methoxy substitution on the phenyl ring of the R position and matching with the previous study. 33 The unfavourable hydrophobic field (cyan contour) cover the R′ substitution and cover a part of the phenyl ring of Y substitution (Figure 1) of the indole-based derivatives. Similarly, the D r a f t hydrogen bond acceptor field was found to be unfavourable near the R′ substitution ( Figure 1).…”
Section: -39 Etc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a useful methodology for studying the interaction mechanism, receptor based molecular docking analysis can offer vivid interaction on picture between a ligand and an acceptor [9]. Combined 3D-QSAR and docking study could offer more information to understand the structural features of bonding site of protein and the detail of proteinligand interactions for purposive directing the design of new potential molecules [10].…”
Section: Androgen Receptor In Prostate Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%