2008
DOI: 10.1139/p07-127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cometary X-ray emission: theoretical cross sections following charge exchange by multiply charged ions of astrophysical interest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These catalogues are useful for improving atomic modeling codes and for the analysis of spectra taken by space-based X-ray observatories, such as those of stellar coronae. Studies involving solar and cometary X-rays are detailed elsewhere in this issue [41][42][43]. The discovery of a new magnetic field X-ray diagnostic emission line in neonlike systems was also made at this facility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These catalogues are useful for improving atomic modeling codes and for the analysis of spectra taken by space-based X-ray observatories, such as those of stellar coronae. Studies involving solar and cometary X-rays are detailed elsewhere in this issue [41][42][43]. The discovery of a new magnetic field X-ray diagnostic emission line in neonlike systems was also made at this facility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of theoretical calculations of single and multiple CE cross sections are also available. These calculations are made difficult by the many-electron and (for molecules) multi-center nature of the targets, and uncertainties in the Auger and Coster-Kronig transition rates (Olson et al 1989;Otranto et al 2008;Wu et al 2009;Simcic et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, CX produces a significant amount of radiation in some laboratory plasmas, such as during neutral beam heating in tokamak plasmas. Identification and interpretation of the X-ray spectral signatures from charge exchange in complex sources, however, has been challenging because little targeted laboratory data are available, and while in some cases agreement between theory and measurement is good [6], in many significant discrepancies still exist [7,8,9]. To help better understand charge exchange The LLNL EBIT facility, home of the original EBIT [10,11], is well tested and has been used in numerous atomic physics and laboratory astrophysics experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the CX case, the 1s2s 3 S 1 → 1s 2 1 S 0 forbidden line "z" is much stronger than the 1s2p 1 P 1 → 1s 2 1 S 0 resonance line "w", in stark contrast to the case of direct electron impact excitation. This well known spectral signature [4,6,8] can be used to identify the presence of CX as an X-ray production mechanism, even using a relatively low-resolution spectrometer, such as a CCD or germanium detector [16,17]. Figure 3 compares the high-n Rydberg X-ray lines produced by CX between Fe 26+ and neutral H 2 , N 2 , and He.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%