Come together: Forging publics in Brisbane’s Gallery of modern Art

Abstract

The Gallery of Modern Art (GoMA) in Brisbane, Australia’s third largest city, recently staged ‘21st Century: Art of the First Decade’. The gallery spaces were replete with a commissioned slide by Carsten Höller, an installation of Rivane Neuenschwande’s I Wish Your Wish (2003), a table of white Legos, a room of purple balloons and other participatory or interactive artworks designed to engage multiple publics and encourage audience participation in a variety of ways. Many of the featured projects used day-to-day experiences and offered new conceptions about art practice and what they can elicit in their public – raise awareness about local issues, help audiences imagine different ways of negotiating their environs or experi-ence a museum in a new way. At times, the bottom floor galleries resembled a theme park – adults and children playing with Legos and using Höller’s slide. This article examines the benefits and limitations of such artistic interventions by relating the GoMA exhibition to Brisbane City Council’s campaign of ‘Together Brisbane’ (featuring images of Neunenschwande’s ribbons); a response to the devastation brought to the city and its surrounds in January 2011. During the Brisbane floods, GoMA’s basement was damaged, the museum closed and upon reopening, visitor numbers soared. In this context, GoMA’s use of engaged art practice – always verging on the ephemeral and ‘fun’ – has been used to project a wider notion of a collective urban public. What questions does this raise, not only regarding the cultural politics around the social and participatory ‘turn’ in art practice, but its use to address a much wider urban public in a moment of crisis.

It’s (Red) Hot Outside! The Aesthetics of Climate Change Activists Extinction Rebellion

“…Here, the protest creates an "disruptive aesthetic" that eludes the regimentation of life and work promulgated by corporate capital and its instrumentalization of human creativity. The works discussed demonstrate that urban public space can have a multitude of functions and is indeed far more flexible and fluid than otherwise conceived; and more, that it is a living and creative space that expands the possibilities of experience through the participatory practices of all participants (Coombs and O'Connor, 2011). Rancière describes this as "establishing an element of interdeterminacy in the relationship between artistic production and political subjectivity" (2007,257).…”

Inside Out:

“…The works discussed demonstrate that urban space can have a multitude of functions and is indeed far more flexible and fluid than often conceived; and more, that it is a living and creative space that expands the possibilities of experience through the participatory practices of provisional publics. 30 Rancière describes this as 'establishing an element of interdeterminacy in the relationship between artistic production and political subjectivity. ' 31 This understanding of urban activations is represented by connections that are established with audiences and communities to promote a greater self-awareness about the role individuals can play in urban life.…”

Does Fiction Reading Make Us Better People? Empathy and Morality in a Literary Empowerment Programme

“…Since the early 1990s, the arts field has seen a participatory turn: Ordinary people are increasingly involved in creative productions and social uses of art (Bishop 2012;Coombs & O'Connor 2011). This is also the case with literature.…”