2018
DOI: 10.3386/w24603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Come Together: Firm Boundaries and Delegation

Abstract: Little is known about the relationship between firm boundaries and the allocation of decision rights within firms. We develop a model in which final good producers choose which suppliers to integrate and whether to delegate decisions to integrated suppliers, when they are ex-ante uncertain about their ability. In this setting, integration has an option value: ownership rights give producers authority to delegate or centralize production decisions, depending on the realized ability of suppliers. To assess the e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They use a database of the construction industry and find that vertical integration and centralization of decision‐making are positively related, especially in more complex and uncertain environments where the need for coordination is arguably greater. Alfaro et al (2018) combine data from the WMS with a firm‐level integration index constructed from the WorldBase dataset and find instead that integration and centralization move in opposite directions. We add to this limited literature by emphasizing the role of the law in shaping firm boundaries and internal organization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They use a database of the construction industry and find that vertical integration and centralization of decision‐making are positively related, especially in more complex and uncertain environments where the need for coordination is arguably greater. Alfaro et al (2018) combine data from the WMS with a firm‐level integration index constructed from the WorldBase dataset and find instead that integration and centralization move in opposite directions. We add to this limited literature by emphasizing the role of the law in shaping firm boundaries and internal organization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific works include Coase (1937), Cyert and March (1963), Williamson (1971), Alchian and Demsetz (1972), Grossman and Hart (1986), Hart and Moore (1990), Holmstrom and Milgrom (1994), DeMeza andLockwood (1998), andHolmstrom (1999). See also Cremér, Garicano, and Prat (2007) for a theory of firm scope and structure based on the specificity of technical languages, and Alfaro, Bloom, Conconi, Fadinger, Legros, Newman, Sadun, and Van Reenen (2019) for a recent contribution examining firm boundaries and delegation. There is also a vast literature on corporate culture.…”
Section: Don't Care What You Do Just Don't Get Arrestedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of international trade, Bloom et al (2020) provide evidence that better‐managed firms are likely to export more products to more destinations. Alfaro et al (2018) analyze the role of delegation for company boundaries. They point out that the positive relationship between delegation and integration is mediated through management practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%