SAE Technical Paper Series 2000
DOI: 10.4271/2000-01-0558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combustion Supervision by Evaluating the Crankshaft Speed and Acceleration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers have also included components for friction torque and valve torque (e.g. Schmidt, Kimmich, Straky, & Isermann, 2000;Fehrenbach, 1991). A measure of the relative torque contribution of the cylinders can be determined from the change in kinetic energy (Kiencke & Nielsen, 2005)…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have also included components for friction torque and valve torque (e.g. Schmidt, Kimmich, Straky, & Isermann, 2000;Fehrenbach, 1991). A measure of the relative torque contribution of the cylinders can be determined from the change in kinetic energy (Kiencke & Nielsen, 2005)…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two indices collectively provided a tool to detect the fault condition of each cylinder. The algorithm developed in reference [90] is based on the model proposed by Lim et al [91] and Schmidt et al [92], which estimated the indicated torque of the engine from instantaneous engine speed through an energy model. To this end, they considered the difference in kinetic and potential energy between two samples and derived the corresponding indicated torque.…”
Section: Monitoring Requirements For Automotive Engines and Relevant Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the engine speed ω e will be assumed reasonably constant for the whole cycle (although this assumption could be unrealistic in some cases [15][16][17]). However, if incycle engine speed fluctuations were taken into account, the following developments will be complicated without improving performance.…”
Section: Time Domain Sampling Versus Crankshaft Angle Domain Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%