44th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference &Amp;amp; Exhibit 2008
DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-4503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combustion Performance of Supersonic Combustor with Stinger-Shaped Fuel Injector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We experimentally confirmed that the performance of a combustor with a stinger injector installed is much higher than that with a conventional circular injector. 9,10) In the series of experiments, we only considered single-injector configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We experimentally confirmed that the performance of a combustor with a stinger injector installed is much higher than that with a conventional circular injector. 9,10) In the series of experiments, we only considered single-injector configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometrical shape of each stinger port is the same as the previous one. [8][9][10] The center-to-center spacing of the injectors (s) was set to be 20 mm with the four injectors oriented to have equal spacing for the combustor width (94.3-mm-width/5 intervals for 4 injectors). This corresponded to s=D $ 6:7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with wall injection techniques such as cavity, fuel was injected into the core stream directly from strut, which can result in a better distribution of fuel in the core stream and lower wall temperature and higher value in the core stream. In addition, the improved combustion performance brings larger thrust increment [6,7], which can overcome the drag caused by strut. However, the drag cannot be neglected in the coldstate flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…relative force of blowing), 2 the geometry of the jet itself (e.g. disturbance to the crossflow), 7,20 and the angle of injection. The dynamic pressure ratio is bounded by maximum fuel system pressure and the desire to produce an underexpanded plume.…”
Section: Design Tradeoffs Of Injection and Mixingmentioning
confidence: 99%