2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combustion and stability characteristics of ultra-compact combustor using cavity for gas turbines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the designs of K Agarwal et al and Abhinav Sinha et al , the geometry has guide vanes for controlling air flow into the cavity. In certain geometries of rectangular combustor with cavities, bluff bodies were present along the center line of combustor (Zeng et al , 2015, Zhang et al , 2018a, 2018b). The strut height was changed in further modification in the work of Wang et al (2015) and struts were removed in the work of Jiang et al (2015).…”
Section: Evolution Of Trapped Vortex Combustor Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the designs of K Agarwal et al and Abhinav Sinha et al , the geometry has guide vanes for controlling air flow into the cavity. In certain geometries of rectangular combustor with cavities, bluff bodies were present along the center line of combustor (Zeng et al , 2015, Zhang et al , 2018a, 2018b). The strut height was changed in further modification in the work of Wang et al (2015) and struts were removed in the work of Jiang et al (2015).…”
Section: Evolution Of Trapped Vortex Combustor Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UCC chambers were intended to solve the application of ITBs in tight spaces; however, their excellent combustion performance has led to their gradual adoption as an alternative to the main combustion chambers or combustion chamber geometries for turbine engines. UCC chambers are currently categorized into two main types: The first is known as the trapped-vortex combustor (TVC), which was first evaluated by Hsu et al and has been studied for decades owing to its simple geometry and good performance; , the second is known as the high- g combustor (HGC). Figure shows a schematic comparison of the two types of combustion chambers, both of which are designed with an annular cavity, which is used to generate and stabilize the vortex, the difference being that the axis of the vortex in the TVC is tangent to the circumference of the cavity, whereas the axis of the vortex in the HGC is aligned with the axis of the cavity …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, Bohan et al , designed a cooling scheme by designing holes to form a cooling film and hence mitigate the localized overheating problem of the HGC. Zhang et al designed an asymmetric combustion chamber, and the experimental results showed that the combustion efficiency was greater than 94%. The combustion efficiency, dynamic pressure characteristics, and emissions were found to be affected by the inlet injection velocity, and the main combustion chamber volume and flame structure of the stabilizer had different degrees of influence on the combustion and stabilization characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ONITORING and characterising the stability of various fuels fired flames in furnaces has become more important than ever due to the recent trend of using a wide range of biomass, biofuels, and low-ranking coals [1]. An unstable flame can cause many combustion problems, such as furnace vibration, low combustion efficiency, high NOx emissions, and even flameouts [2]. In addition, the operation of power plants must be flexible in order to accommodate the intermittency of fluctuating demand by the users and increasing levels of renewable sources such as wind farms and solar stations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%