2016
DOI: 10.1515/bpasts-2016-0080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combustability of building products versus fire safety

Abstract: Abstract. The combustion process is described and analysed based on the experimental results in the context of building fire safety. Data are obtained by means of five standard methods: ISO 5657 ignitability test, ISO 5657 cone calorimeter, ISO 9705 room corner test, EN ISO 1716 small calorimeter, and EN ISO 1182 small furnace. Various categories of building products were tested: cellulose based products (particle boards, plywoods), solid wood, floor coverings, concrete, ceramics, insulations (thermal and/or a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, much attention is brought to the problems with energy conservation in standardised fire testing of combustible elements 10,18 and their potential impact on the development of compartment fires. 19,20 This aspect is essential, as in a real building, the parameters of the walls will affect the growth of fire (in positive or negative). However, in furnace testing, these effects are not quantified, which may promote materials and assemblies that have a higher value of fire resistance rating (and not necessarily lead to a safer building).…”
Section: Some Recognised Issues With the Standard Fire Exposure Conmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, much attention is brought to the problems with energy conservation in standardised fire testing of combustible elements 10,18 and their potential impact on the development of compartment fires. 19,20 This aspect is essential, as in a real building, the parameters of the walls will affect the growth of fire (in positive or negative). However, in furnace testing, these effects are not quantified, which may promote materials and assemblies that have a higher value of fire resistance rating (and not necessarily lead to a safer building).…”
Section: Some Recognised Issues With the Standard Fire Exposure Conmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this is well known for compartment fires, these effects are entirely disregarded in standardised furnace testing, due to the prescribed nature of the thermal exposure. Moreover, much attention is brought to the problems with energy conservation in standardised fire testing of combustible elements and their potential impact on the development of compartment fires . This aspect is essential, as in a real building, the parameters of the walls will affect the growth of fire (in positive or negative).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particular problems of the building performance: sustainability [6], fire threat [7,8] and frost durability [9]. R. Geryło [6] presents conditioning for sustainable building relevant to energy consuming.…”
Section: Risk Of Performance Evaluation -The Influence Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of sustainability, energy related conditions constitute a new set of indicators for identifying the performance and efficiency of building construction technologies. Two further papers entitled "Combustibility of building products versus fire safety" (J. Fangrat) [7] and "The philosophy of fire safety engineering in the shaping of civil engineering development"…”
Section: Risk Of Performance Evaluation -The Influence Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• risk of performance evaluation -the influence of the uncertainty in the assessment of materials properties tested in laboratories [4] and on site [5]; • the building performance: sustainability [6], fire treatment [7,8] and frost durability [9]; • the analytical [10] and numerical [11] models seeking for the technological [11] and construction [10] solution; • seeking for new materials solutions by better understanding of the nature of materials [12], material composition modification [13] and the use of the relatively new mechanism [16,17], prediction methods of the response of an engineering structure to the given loads throughout its service life [18][19][20], even for very sophisticated structures [18][19], to new diagnostic tools [20]. In almost all cases, the leading idea is computer simulation (in virtual laboratory) of the real performance of the subjects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%