2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.md.2016.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COMBO: An efficient Bayesian optimization library for materials science

Abstract: In many subfields of chemistry and physics, numerous attempts have been made to accelerate scientific discovery using data-driven experimental design algorithms. Among them, Bayesian optimization has been proven to be an effective tool. A standard implementation (e.g., scikit-learn), however, can accommodate only small training data. We designed an efficient protocol for Bayesian optimization that employs Thompson sampling, random feature maps, one-rank Cholesky update and automatic hyperparameter tuning, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
218
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 267 publications
(225 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
218
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ML-driven experiments tend to identify promising materials much more efficiently than a naive search. 19 Several implementations of ML-optimized experimental design have emerged, including COMBO, 20 FUELS, 19 and work from Xue et al 18 …”
Section: Materials Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML-driven experiments tend to identify promising materials much more efficiently than a naive search. 19 Several implementations of ML-optimized experimental design have emerged, including COMBO, 20 FUELS, 19 and work from Xue et al 18 …”
Section: Materials Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We implemented an open source package for Bayesian optimization in python (COMBO: COMmon Bayesian Optimization library, https://github.com/tsudalab/ combo) [11]. Thompson sampling, random feature maps and one-rank Cholesky update made it particularly suitable to handle large training datasets.…”
Section: Combo: Bayesian Optimization Packagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the efficiency of MDTS, we compared the application of MDTS and an efficient Bayesian optimization package [11] to design optimal SiliconGermanium (Si-Ge) alloy interfacial structures (Si:Ge = 1:1) in order to achieve both minimum and maximum thermal conductance [7]. The total computation time was Algorithm 1: Monte Carlo tree search divided into design time and simulation time.…”
Section: Mdts: a Python Package For Mctsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, many trial calculations are still necessary to determine a single grain boundary structure. More recently, much more efficient methods based on machine learning techniques, including virtual screening and Bayesian optimization have been proposed by the present authors [12,[15][16][17]. Those methods are described below.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%