2021
DOI: 10.1107/s1600577521009450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining X-ray excited optical luminescence and X-ray absorption spectroscopy for correlative imaging on the nanoscale

Abstract: X-ray absorption and optical luminescence can both provide valuable but very different information on the chemical and physical properties of materials. Although it is known that the spectral characteristics of many materials are highly heterogeneous on the micro- and/or nanoscale, no methodology has so far been shown to be capable of spatially resolving both full X-ray absorption and X-ray excited optical luminescence (XEOL) spectra on the nanoscale in a correlative manner. For this purpose, the scanning tran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this framework, the use of thin sections (~10 μ m) allows to probe a similar sample volume (at least for XANES and XRD), while also increasing the homogeneity of the sample along the radiation direction. Moreover, to achieve a better correlation with X-ray-based analysis, the X-ray excited optical luminescence could also be employed (Hageraats et al, 2021).…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this framework, the use of thin sections (~10 μ m) allows to probe a similar sample volume (at least for XANES and XRD), while also increasing the homogeneity of the sample along the radiation direction. Moreover, to achieve a better correlation with X-ray-based analysis, the X-ray excited optical luminescence could also be employed (Hageraats et al, 2021).…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The X-ray nanoprobe beamlines at synchrotron facilities include ID16A (Villar et al, 2018) andID16B (Martı ´nez-Criado et al, 2016) at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, the HERMES beamline of Synchrotron SOLEIL (Hageraats et al, 2021), 26-ID-C at the Advanced Photon Source (Winarski et al, 2012), I14 at Diamond Light Source (Quinn et al, 2021), NanoMAX at MAX IV (Johansson et al, 2021), CARNAU ´BA of the Laborato ´rio Nacional de Luz Sı ´ncrotron (Tolentino et al, 2017), PETRA III beamline P06 of the Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (Schroer et al, 2016), 3-ID HXN beamline of the National Synchrotron Light Source II (Nazaretski et al, 2017), BL37XU and BL39XU beamlines at SPring-8 (Koyama et al, 2011) and the TPS 23A beamline at the Taiwan Photon Source (TPS) (Lin et al, 2020;Wu et al, 2022). The TPS 23A X-nanoprobe not only exhibits proficiency in XEOL, TR-XEOL, XAS and XRF measurements but also comprises an HB-T interferometer built into the endstation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, bulk measurements of XEOL have been used in tandem with x-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), demonstrating changes in luminescence intensity when sweeping the incident x-ray energy over the absorption edge of an element abundant in the sample [12,13]. While XAS-XEOL is a relatively mature characterization technique using large probes, the application of correlative XRF and XEOL microscopy to characterizing the local optoelectronic character and composition of optically active materials is still in its infancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%