Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) 2014
DOI: 10.3115/v1/p14-2086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Word Patterns and Discourse Markers for Paradigmatic Relation Classification

Abstract: Distinguishing between paradigmatic relations such as synonymy, antonymy and hypernymy is an important prerequisite in a range of NLP applications. In this paper, we explore discourse relations as an alternative set of features to lexico-syntactic patterns. We demonstrate that statistics over discourse relations, collected via explicit discourse markers as proxies, can be utilized as salient indicators for paradigmatic relations in multiple languages, outperforming patterns in terms of recall and F 1 -score. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A useful property of our model is its ability to control the representation of antonym pairs. Outside the VSM literature several works identified antonyms using word co-occurrence statistics, manually and automatically induced patterns, the WordNet lexicon and thesauri (Lin et al, 2003;Turney, 2008;Wang et al, 2010;Mohammad et al, 2013;Schulte im Walde and Koper, 2013;Roth and Schulte im Walde, 2014). Recently, Yih et al (2012), Chang et al (2013) and Ono et al (2015) proposed word representation methods that assign dissimilar vectors to antonyms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A useful property of our model is its ability to control the representation of antonym pairs. Outside the VSM literature several works identified antonyms using word co-occurrence statistics, manually and automatically induced patterns, the WordNet lexicon and thesauri (Lin et al, 2003;Turney, 2008;Wang et al, 2010;Mohammad et al, 2013;Schulte im Walde and Koper, 2013;Roth and Schulte im Walde, 2014). Recently, Yih et al (2012), Chang et al (2013) and Ono et al (2015) proposed word representation methods that assign dissimilar vectors to antonyms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paradigmatic relations such as synonymy, antonymy and hypernymy are notoriously difficult to distinguish because distributions of context words tend to be very similar across the relations [4,5]. An interesting example in [6], with regard to the sentence The boy/girl/person loves/hates the cat, the nominal co-hyponyms boy, girl and their hypernym person as well as the verbal antonyms love and hate occur in identical contexts, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lin et al (2003) proposed two textual patterns indicating semantic incompatibility, from X to Y and either X or Y, to distinguish opposites from semantically similar words. Roth and Schulte im Walde (2014) proposed a method that combined patterns with discourse markers for classifying paradigmatic relations including antonymy, synonymy, and hypernymy. Recently, Schwartz et al (2015) used two prominent patterns from Lin et al (2003) to learn word embeddings that distinguished antonyms from similar words in determining degrees of similarity and word analogy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%