Proceedings Third IEEE International High-Assurance Systems Engineering Symposium (Cat. No.98EX231)
DOI: 10.1109/hase.1998.731591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining various solution techniques for dynamic fault tree analysis of computer systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to earlier DFT tools, DFTCalc's input language is more powerful and imposes fewer syntactic restrictions: DFTCalc allows any DFT to be a spare component or a trigger, and not only a BE, as in [16]. This is a big advantage in practice, since spare components and triggers are often complete subsystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to earlier DFT tools, DFTCalc's input language is more powerful and imposes fewer syntactic restrictions: DFTCalc allows any DFT to be a spare component or a trigger, and not only a BE, as in [16]. This is a big advantage in practice, since spare components and triggers are often complete subsystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches are mostly concerned with the problem of fault tree evaluation, whereas our focus was on automatic synthesis. Also concerned with fault tree evaluation is DIFTree [MDCS98], a methodology for the analysis of dynamic fault trees, implemented in the Galileo tool [SDC99]. It uses a modularisation technique [DR96] to identify (in linear time) independent sub-trees, that can be evaluated using the most appropriate techniques (BDD-based techniques for static fault trees, Markov techniques or Monte Carlo simulation for dynamic ones).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FTA, on the other hand, is a deductive technique; it starts by considering an unintended behavior of the system at hand, and traces it, in a backward reasoning fashion, to the corresponding causes. The COMPASS methodology can automatically generate (dynamic) fault trees [16,24], given an extended model and a property representing the hazard. Furthermore, (dynamic) FMEA tables can be automatically generated, given a set of failure modes (more in general, a set of fault configurations, which may include combinations of different faults) and a set of properties.…”
Section: Verification Of Safety/dependability Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%