Combining value chain and social network analysis as a viable tool for informing targeted disease surveillance in the rural poultry sector of Zambia

Abstract

Diseases are among the greatest challenges to the rural poultry sector in sub-Saharan Africa. The lack of a sustainable poultry disease surveillance system and the possible existence of communities and occasions where the interaction between birds is high present an opportunity for targeted surveillance of poultry diseases in these regions. However, the establishment of such a system requires adequate knowledge of the sector in the targeted area. Zambia is an example of a developing country located in the tropics that faces the challenge of frequent poultry disease outbreaks. Consequently, an interview-based survey to study the poultry sector's market chain and social networks was conducted in Eastern Zambia to derive information required for configuring targeted surveillance. This survey involved a poultry value chain analysis that also included an assessment of trading practices to identify biosecurity hot spots within the chain that could be targeted for disease surveillance. A social network analysis of poultry movement within Eastern Zambia was also conducted using whole-network analysis and ego network analysis to identify poultry trade hubs that could be targeted for poultry disease surveillance based on their centrality within the network and their size and influence within their ego networks. Rural farmers, middlemen and market traders were identified as biosecurity risk hot spots whose poultry and utensils could be targeted for disease surveillance within the value chain. Furthermore, social network analysis identified four districts as poultry trade hubs that could be targeted for disease surveillance. This study is the first to formally describe poultry movement networks within Zambia and the surrounding region. Its findings provide data required to implement targeted surveillance in regions where resources are either inadequate or non-existent, and the results provide a deeper understanding of the cultural and practical constraints that influence trade in developing countries.

Analysis of the movement of live broilers in Guangxi, China and implications for avian influenza control

“…Knowledge of animal movement patterns provides essential information for animal disease control, including surveillance and risk analysis, and allows a more targeted approach for improving the effectiveness of disease control strategies (Marquetoux et al., 2016; Porphyre et al., 2019; Vallee et al., 2013). Social network analysis (SNA) can be used to explore how network configurations affect the dynamics of infectious diseases and to identify premises or areas where risk‐based interventions should be targeted (Kurscheid et al., 2017; Li et al., 2020; Marquetoux et al., 2016; Mubamba et al., 2018). SNA studies have been conducted on live poultry movements in several countries, including Bangladesh, Cambodia and Thailand (Moyen et al., 2018; Poolkhet et al., 2013; Van Kerkhove et al., 2009), as well as in China (Martin et al., 2011; Zhou et al., 2015).…”

The Status of Indigenous Chicken Genetic Resources: An Analysis of Farmers’ Perspectives and Implications for Breed Conservation Priorities in Zambia

“…The prevalence of poultry diseases also depends on the production system and season. A majority of SSFs produce ICs under FRS (Figure 1b) and SIS, in which outbreaks of these diseases and parasites are rampant [36,37]. Cases of poultry diseases vary with changes in seasonality.…”

Strategies for promoting sustainable use and conservation of indigenous chicken breeds in Sub-Saharan Africa: Lessons from low-income countries

“…In 2017, the highly pathogenic H5N8 avian influenza negatively impacted the country's poultry sector, leading to thousands of birds being culled (PAZ 2021). Common diseases such as typhoid, infectious coryza, Gumboro, worm infestation, and external parasites have also contributed to the poor performance and high mortalities experienced in the IC sector (Phiri et al 2007;Simainga et al 2011;Mubamba et al 2018).…”