2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89812-2_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Two Structured Domains for Modeling Various Graph Matching Problems

Abstract: Abstract. Graph pattern matching is a central application in many fields. In various areas, the structure of the pattern can only be approximated and exact matching is then too accurate. We focus here on approximations declared by the user within the pattern (optional nodes and forbidden arcs), covering graph/subgraph mono/isomorphism problems. In this paper, we show how the integration of two domains of computation over countable structures, graphs and maps, can be used for modeling and solving various graph … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Deville, Dooms, & Zampelli, 2008). The difference between graph homomorphism and subgraph isomorphism is that the former requires a correspondence between vertices, while the latter requires a one-to-one correspondence.…”
Section: Graph Morphismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Deville, Dooms, & Zampelli, 2008). The difference between graph homomorphism and subgraph isomorphism is that the former requires a correspondence between vertices, while the latter requires a one-to-one correspondence.…”
Section: Graph Morphismsmentioning
confidence: 99%