2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12149-019-01380-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining the radiomic features and traditional parameters of 18F-FDG PET with clinical profiles to improve prognostic stratification in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radiomic features were combined with clinical parameters to construct a predictive model in 6/13 studies [18][19][20][21][22][23]. These prediction models resulted in high-performance levels with good discriminating power (AUC 0.69-0.92).…”
Section: Esophageal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiomic features were combined with clinical parameters to construct a predictive model in 6/13 studies [18][19][20][21][22][23]. These prediction models resulted in high-performance levels with good discriminating power (AUC 0.69-0.92).…”
Section: Esophageal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected three matrices to extract radiomic features from 18 F-FDG PET images in our study, included SUV histogram analysis, the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), and the graylevel size-zone matrix (GLSZM) [25][26][27]. For the analysis of GLCM and GLSZM, the 18 F-FDG radioactivity uptake within the contour margin was resampled into 64 different values (bin number of 64) [17,26,28]. Subsequently, the radiomic features were computed as described in the previous studies [25][26][27].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the analysis of GLCM and GLSZM, the 18 F-FDG radioactivity uptake within the contour margin was resampled into 64 different values (bin number of 64) [17,26,28]. Subsequently, the radiomic features were computed as described in the previous studies [25][26][27]. Desseroit et al reported the test-retest variabilities for the image features calculated from the SUV histogram, the GLCM, and the GLSZM in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous radiomics studies 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 27 in EC mainly focused on the intratumoral region alone, whereas little is known about the role of peritumoral radiomics features, which are likely to provide crucial but easily overlooked information about pCR. In this context, we hypothesized that the subtle structural deformations occurring around esophageal wall regions seen on CT images could be potential biomarkers to nCRT response in ESCC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%