2014
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining the ‘bottom up’ and ‘top down’ approaches in pharmacokinetic modelling: fittingPBPKmodels to observed clinical data

Abstract: Pharmacokinetic models range from being entirely exploratory and empirical, to semi-mechanistic and ultimately complex physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models. This choice is conditional on the modelling purpose as well as the amount and quality of the available data. The main advantage of PBPK models is that they can be used to extrapolate outside the studied population and experimental conditions. The trade-off for this advantage is a complex system of differential equations with a considerable n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
183
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
183
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter approach has been taken up in regulatory guidance on drug-drug interaction assessment in special populations, including pediatric subjects, by both the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency. Such use of PBPK models to extrapolate outside the study populations and experimental conditions required careful attention to a number of issues and confidence that key systems parameters within the PBPK model were correct (Tsamandouras et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter approach has been taken up in regulatory guidance on drug-drug interaction assessment in special populations, including pediatric subjects, by both the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency. Such use of PBPK models to extrapolate outside the study populations and experimental conditions required careful attention to a number of issues and confidence that key systems parameters within the PBPK model were correct (Tsamandouras et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter also highlights the importance of having good disposition data available for the purpose of judging mechanistic bioavailability predictions, particularly due to the possible confounding issues that can arise from the use of the oral data to calibrate some of the absorption parameters in the model, particularly when the predictions are not in agreement with the observed clinical data. The latter might lead to biased estimates of the absorption parameters due to the fact that the disposition parameters were biased in the first instance (42,91).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If certain parameters cannot be unambiguously informed from available clinical data then such parameters may be non-identifiable and therefore prone to bias and uncertainty. This problem is well documented for complex mechanistic models and particularly relevant when parameters estimated are to be used for extrapolation (83). Although these issues have been discussed in detail in relation to hepatic disposition (83,84), they are particularly pertinent to mechanistic kidney models, due to the high number of parameters used in these models.…”
Section: Appropriate Clinical Data Are Needed For Modelling Renal Drumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem is well documented for complex mechanistic models and particularly relevant when parameters estimated are to be used for extrapolation (83). Although these issues have been discussed in detail in relation to hepatic disposition (83,84), they are particularly pertinent to mechanistic kidney models, due to the high number of parameters used in these models. As knowledge of specific drugs and biological systems are improved, such uncertainties are likely to become reduced, providing more confidence in model predictions (5,85).…”
Section: Appropriate Clinical Data Are Needed For Modelling Renal Drumentioning
confidence: 99%