2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11242-011-9917-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Simulation and Emulation for Calibrating Sequentially Reactive Transport Systems

Abstract: Reaction rates are usually identified at laboratory scale, by comparing measured concentrations with those of the corresponding mathematical models. However, laboratoryscale reaction rates may not necessarily reflect the reactive transport scenarios at the field scale. Thus, a major challenge for field-scale modeling is the determination of reaction kinetics and rates. The conventional inversion of reaction rates relies on optimization approaches that require expensive computation to obtain the gradient of obj… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To investigate for the impact of each input parameter on output result, surrogate models are developed to allow for parameter sensitivity analysis and UQ 29. In general, the parameter optimization involves running a series of simulations within the space of input parameters and searching for the best fit of model to experimental data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate for the impact of each input parameter on output result, surrogate models are developed to allow for parameter sensitivity analysis and UQ 29. In general, the parameter optimization involves running a series of simulations within the space of input parameters and searching for the best fit of model to experimental data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibrating the nine parameters in this model requires a full isotherm at 5% humidity steps over a wide range of humidities and a multi-step optimization process to ensure the global minimum parameter set is identified. PSUADE 41,42 (uncertainty quantification code and sampling-based search) is utilized in the initial parameter calibration step to access and narrow down the parameter range. In this method, over 3000 parameter sets were generated spanning user defined parameter ranges, using the Latin Hyper Cube sampling technique 43 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model parameters are estimated using the uncertainty quantification code PSUADE 41 , 42 and calibrated using the shuffled complex evolution (SCE) method 45 . First, a sampling based non-intrusive Latin Hypercube (LH) sampling method 43 is used to generate a large number of sample points; sufficiently large to represent the parametric space.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model parameters are estimated using the uncertainty quantification code PSUADE 4 , 47 and calibrated using the shuffled complex evolution (SCE) method 48 . First, a sampling based non-intrusive Latin Hypercube (LH) sampling method 49 is used to generate a large number of sample points; sufficiently large to represent the parametric space.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%