2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-018-1079-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Shape from Shading and Stereo: A Joint Variational Method for Estimating Depth, Illumination and Albedo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors in [23] [24] use a winner-takes-all strategy to optimize the final disparity by choosing at each pixel the disparity associated with the minimal cost value. Other methods like graph cut [25] or coarse-to-fine refinement [26] are instead used for optimizing the final disparity. Besides the above methods computing cost volumes, methods based on statistical models, i.e.…”
Section: Related Work a Stereo Depth Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in [23] [24] use a winner-takes-all strategy to optimize the final disparity by choosing at each pixel the disparity associated with the minimal cost value. Other methods like graph cut [25] or coarse-to-fine refinement [26] are instead used for optimizing the final disparity. Besides the above methods computing cost volumes, methods based on statistical models, i.e.…”
Section: Related Work a Stereo Depth Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One could consider as loss function ρ the normalized sum of squared deviations ρ SSD (x, y) = 1 m m c=1 (x c − y c ) 2 or a robust variant of it, and then linearize (2) using first-order Taylor expansion as in [7,12]. However, linearization requires small depth increments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods combining stereo and shading information under natural illumination have also recently been developed [10,11,17], but they only consider photometry as a way to refine an existing multi-view 3D-reconstruction, which remains the baseline of the process. We would rather like to follow an end-to-end joint approach, as for instance in the very recent work [12]. In comparison with [12], the approach presented in the next section avoids linearization of the fidelity term and is therefore slightly more generic, since any robust photo-consistency measure (including those based on non-differentiable or non-convex loss functions) can be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the SFS-based reconstruction method has attracted attention from numerous researchers. Maurer et al [16] used a method that combined SFS and stereo to establish the functional energy with a detail-preserving anisotropic second-order smoothness term, and estimated the depth of the object surface. Lu et al [17] proposed a Lambert-Phong hybrid model algorithm, and obtained the coordinate information of the highlighted region of the droplet surface by the mask regions with convolutional neural network (R-CNN).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%