2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00227.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Scaffolds and Osteogenic Cells in Regenerative Bone Surgery: A Preliminary Histological Report in Human Maxillary Sinus Augmentation

Abstract: Within the limits of the present report, the histological data in humans confirmed that tissue-engineered bone and calcium phosphate allowed newly formed bone after maxillary sinus augmentation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, different approaches have been developed to deal with this problem, and maxillary sinus floor elevation is an effective way to restore the posterior upper jaw [3-5]. Although various bone-grafting materials, including autogenous bone, allogeneic bone and xenografts, are currently being used for maxillary augmentation, these grafts have disadvantages, including finite donor availability, potential donor site morbidity, disease transmission, immunogenic response and high cost [6-8]. As a consequence, many biomaterials with good biocompatibility have been developed as an alternative to traditional graft materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, different approaches have been developed to deal with this problem, and maxillary sinus floor elevation is an effective way to restore the posterior upper jaw [3-5]. Although various bone-grafting materials, including autogenous bone, allogeneic bone and xenografts, are currently being used for maxillary augmentation, these grafts have disadvantages, including finite donor availability, potential donor site morbidity, disease transmission, immunogenic response and high cost [6-8]. As a consequence, many biomaterials with good biocompatibility have been developed as an alternative to traditional graft materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these regenerative techniques, maxillary sinus augmentation [3][4][5][6][7], guided bone regeneration (GBR) [8], and split-crest techniques [9] are the most commonly used procedures to restore the ideal anatomical bone conditions and to allow simultaneous and/or subsequent placement of dental implants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few prior studies reported clinical application of TE-bone substitutes derived from alveolar bone cells [29], [30], [31], [50]. Pradel and colleagues used second passage mandibular and maxillary osteoblasts, isolated by establishing explant cultures and cultured on collagen scaffolds 3–4 days, to regenerate bone after mandibular cyst enucleation and for osteoplasty in patients with cleft alveolus [29], [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New vital bone formation with sufficient stability for implant placement was found with osteoblast-derived TE-substitutes, similarly to periosteal cells-derived TE-substitutes. Mangano and colleagues used third/fourth passage mandibular bone marrow osteoblasts, isolated from bone cores by collagenase digestion and cultured on polymer scaffolds for 1 week, for sinus augmentation procedures [50]. After 6 months, clinical, histological and computed tomography evaluations revealed a significant average vertical bone gain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%