2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining quantitative and qualitative approaches using Sequential Window Acquisition of All Theoretical Fragment-Ion methodology for the detection of pharmaceuticals and related compounds in river fish extracted using a sample miniaturized method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recoveries were calculated as the ratio between the peak area in the extract from spiked fish sample and the peak area in a blank fish extract. The recovery was acceptable between 70 and 130% for majority of compounds, values that fall into the range from other reported studies of pharmaceuticals validated in fish matrix [1 , 2 , 19 , 20] . The precision of the method expressed by the intra-day repeatability was calculated as the relative standard deviation (RSD%) obtained from the relative recoveries ( n = 3) for each concentration level, while the inter-day precision was determined by analyzing of the concentration levels for three consecutive days.…”
Section: Methods Validationsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recoveries were calculated as the ratio between the peak area in the extract from spiked fish sample and the peak area in a blank fish extract. The recovery was acceptable between 70 and 130% for majority of compounds, values that fall into the range from other reported studies of pharmaceuticals validated in fish matrix [1 , 2 , 19 , 20] . The precision of the method expressed by the intra-day repeatability was calculated as the relative standard deviation (RSD%) obtained from the relative recoveries ( n = 3) for each concentration level, while the inter-day precision was determined by analyzing of the concentration levels for three consecutive days.…”
Section: Methods Validationsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Owing to the fact that SWATH acquisition acquires in parallel in scan mode, it is possible to perform a retrospective analysis into the files and retrieve analytes which were not in the target list of compounds, as reported in Peña-Herrera et al. [2] .…”
Section: *Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diltiazem concentrations were less than 10 n g −1 in all matrices (brain, kidney, liver, pancreas and plasma), whereas venlafaxine was quantified in a range from 27.4 ng g −1 (skin) to 153.8 ng g −1 (brain). The presence of diltiazem has been reported by other authors [25] in the brain of fish with a Cmax of 1.5 ng g −1 and a Cmax of 34 ng g −1 in the muscle of Leuciscus cephalus captured from the Sava river in Slovenia has been reported by [5] . Othe authors [26] reported a Cmax of 20.8 ng g −1 for venlafaxine in the liver of rainbow trout exposed to undiluted effluent from a Swedish municipal WWTP for 13 days.…”
Section: Occurrence Of the Target Analytes In Fish Samplesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Currently, there are several analytical methods for the extraction of organic pollutants that mainly focus on their extraction in fish muscle [ [5] , [6] , [7] ] or in whole fish homogenate [ [8] , [9] , [10] ] because these can be obtained in sufficient amounts even from small species and are easy to produce, respectively. Analyzing a single tissue or homogenate fish does not allow to obtain information on the distribution of the contaminants within the organism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Z-Sep+ is used for samples containing greater than 15% fat, and finally Z-Sep/C18 is used for samples containing less than 15% fat [167,169]. Z-Sep/C18 was used for pharmaceutical analysis from fish samples [170].…”
Section: New Sorbentsmentioning
confidence: 99%