2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00118-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining price and quantity controls to mitigate global climate change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
315
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 542 publications
(331 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
315
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, carbon emission trading (CET) market is an effective way to realize total amount targets. It works by first giving participants a limit on emission permits, and then allowing them to buy or sell permits in the market (Pizer, 2002). The CET market increases enterprise's production cost.…”
Section: Total Amount Targets Are More Effective On the Energy Consermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, carbon emission trading (CET) market is an effective way to realize total amount targets. It works by first giving participants a limit on emission permits, and then allowing them to buy or sell permits in the market (Pizer, 2002). The CET market increases enterprise's production cost.…”
Section: Total Amount Targets Are More Effective On the Energy Consermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, a tax provides a constant incentive for producers to reduce emissions, so they reduce emissions more when the abatement costs are low, and reduce them less when they are high. Because of this flexibility, studies have estimated that a tax could result in substantially greater net benefits than a cap and trade system (Hoel and Karp, 2001;Newell and Pizer, 2002;Pizer, 2002). The relative disadvantage of a cap-andtrade scheme can be reduced by setting a maximum (or minimum) permit price, which would be maintained by the government selling or purhasing permits as required.…”
Section: Emissions Tradingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis, together with available estimates of parameter values, supports the view that taxes dominate quotas for climate policy. Numerical results that do not use the linear-quadratic model also support this conclusion (Pizer 1999;Hoel and Karp 2001;Pizer 2002).…”
Section: The Linear-quadratic Modelmentioning
confidence: 76%