2015
DOI: 10.1080/01494929.2015.1059785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Parallel and Exploratory Factor Analysis in Identifying Relationship Scales in Secondary Data

Abstract: Common methods used in the literature to identify factors within exploratory factor analysis has been shown to be potentially problematic. This brief report illustrates a state of the art approach in identifying factor structure by adding parallel analysis prior to exploratory factor analysis. Parallel analysis enables researchers to have a high degree of confidence of the number of factors to extract prior to exploratory factor analysis. The procedure is illustrated by using items from the National Survey of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
54
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Data of the FTNS were analysed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). Scores of items 6, 7, 8 and 13 were reversed prior to the analysis (Wood et al , ). Maximum likelihood estimation method and varimax rotation were used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data of the FTNS were analysed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). Scores of items 6, 7, 8 and 13 were reversed prior to the analysis (Wood et al , ). Maximum likelihood estimation method and varimax rotation were used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PA is the most recommended procedure to select the optimal number of factors in the data [65][66][67]. Specifically, this statistical technique allows to reduce over identification of factors due to sampling error [68]. Factors with eigenvalues above of 95th percentile of the eigenvalues of the parallel factor were retained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31] Parallel analysis is considered superior to reliance solely on eigenvalue scores and can minimise over-identification of factors based on sampling error. [32] Items were retained on the domain on which they had the highest loading, even if the cross-loading on a second domain was within 0.2. This was considered acceptable as the purpose of the factor analysis was to group topic areas rather than to develop a validated scale to be applied in other studies, when restrictions on cross-loading would apply.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%