2011
DOI: 10.1002/ps.2134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining novel monitoring tools and precision application technologies for integrated high‐tech crop protection in the future (a discussion document)

Abstract: The possibility of combining novel monitoring techniques and precision spraying for crop protection in the future is discussed. A generic model for an innovative crop protection system has been used as a framework. This system will be able to monitor the entire cropping system and identify the presence of relevant pests, diseases and weeds online, and will be location specific. The system will offer prevention, monitoring, interpretation and action which will be performed in a continuous way. The monitoring is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
10

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
32
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The technology is still emerging and has a few challenges, including oc-cluded leaves, misshapen leaves, moving leaves, and dusty leaves (see Chapter 15). Nevertheless, the algorithms to account for the changing plant and environmental conditions are being developed by engineers and computer scientists and will result in more accurate recognition and precision application systems (Zijlstra et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The technology is still emerging and has a few challenges, including oc-cluded leaves, misshapen leaves, moving leaves, and dusty leaves (see Chapter 15). Nevertheless, the algorithms to account for the changing plant and environmental conditions are being developed by engineers and computer scientists and will result in more accurate recognition and precision application systems (Zijlstra et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trend for improving plant recognition technology and incorporating it with other management applications (e.g., yield, soil nutrients, moisture) is increasing at a pace that is sim-ilar to the development of other high-end technology systems. For example, Zijlstra et al (2011) describe technologically advanced devises, such as electronic noses that detect volatiles released by pathogens, acoustic detectors for identifying insects, and portable PCR units for real-time identification of fungal, bacterial, and viral diseases, as the future for monitoring pests in a comprehensive program for managing cropping systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we expect to continue to maintain current yields and also increase production in the future, we will have to think more broadly in incorporating alternative approaches in our management strategies. A possible starting point is the model by Zijlstra et al (2011) for a crop protection system of the future that is based on novel monitoring tools and precision application technologies ( Figure 4). With a historical account of the field and following the planting of the crop, monitoring is conducted on macro-and microscales.…”
Section: Aerial Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At any point, certain locations or "hotspots" could be targeted in the field with the appropriate and precise action made at individual plant scales. According to Zijlstra et al (2011), the twostep monitoring from macro-to microscale levels would enable earlier detection of pests (e.g., weeds) and thus require new action thresholds and dose-response relationships, which would require substantial research effort.…”
Section: Aerial Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commercial use of the CHS is very rare but it is affordable and efficient. Zijlstra et al (2011) presented state-of-the art monitoring tools and precision application technologies for integrated high-tech crop protection. Koch & Weisser (2000) measured savings from 10-35% in a 3-7-year old apple orchard and from 35-45% in a 1-year old apple orchard using optical tree detection sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%