Combining Narration‐Based Interviews with Topical Interviews: Methodological Reflections on Research Practices

Abstract

While qualitative interviewing methods based on story telling are powerful in eliciting narrations that are structured according to interviewees' relevance systems, topical interviewing can build upon existing knowledge resulting from prior (interpretational) work. The problem-centred interview (PCI) is an attempt to integrate both styles of qualitative interviewing and is presently in wide use in the German-language social scientific community. It is especially helpful for research endeavours that focus on biographical experiences and orientations from individuals' perspective. Within one interview session, the PCI combines an open narrative beginning with a more structured thematic interview. This article discusses the advantages and limitations of such a combination by introducing an example of its potential use within a research project on biographical orientations in migration processes. The PCI is also placed within the existing canon of qualitative interview methods and methodologies, highlighting its merits as well as its crucial problems. IntroductionThe problem-centred interview (PCI) focuses on reconstructing orientations 1 and structures of meaning within a specific social context.

Fifty shades of freedom. Voluntary childlessness as women's ultimate liberation

“…The interviews were semi-structured, encouraging the women to reflect on their own perceptions and talk freely about their childfree life (Scheibelhofer, 2007). The aim of the interviews was to explore the lived experiences of voluntarily childless women in contemporary Swedish society.…”

Missing Out on the Parenthood Bonus? Voluntarily Childless in a “Child-friendly” Society

“…All interviews produced detailed accounts of the interviewees' experiences (Holt 2010;TrierBieniek 2012). The semi-structured character of the interviews encouraged the informants to reflect on their experiences and to share them in an open manner (Scheibelhofer 2007). The interviews were recorded with one exception.…”

Decolonizing Research on Heritage Language Maintenance and Loss:

“…In research on language maintenance, structured interviews are the least appropriate since they focus on a very narrow way of representing participants' answers and do not provide a space for openness and sharing life narratives. Scheibelhofer (2008) emphasize the benefits of "problem-centered interviews" in qualitative research involving some autobiographical aspects because this type of interviews opens with a broad introduction offering a participant to start with a narrative beginning which is later elaborated on with the help of semi-structured part. Longitudinal qualitative interviews are the most insightful if there is a need to understand changes and developments among the same participants over a period of time (Hermanowicz, 2013) , and may be applicable in terms of research on language maintenance and loss which occurs not as a single specific event but more like a long process, often invisible to those involved.…”