2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.06.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining multiple biometric traits with an order-preserving score fusion algorithm

Abstract: Cite this article as: Yicong Liang, Xiaoqing Ding, Changsong Liu, Jing-Hao Xue, Combining multiple biometric traits with an order-preserving score fusion algorithm, Neurocomputing, http://dx. AbstractMultibiometric systems based on score fusion can effectively combine the discriminative power of multiple biometric traits and overcome the limitations of individual trait, leading to a better performance of biometric authentication. To tackle multiple adverse issues with the established classifierbased or probabi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likelihood ratio achieves optimal performance at all operating points on receiver operating characteristics (ROCs), provided the estimation of probability density functions for genuine and impostor distributions are accurate. Parametric density estimation methods [18, 19] assume some predefined model for genuine and impostor scores distribution which is not always accurate, whereas non‐parametric methods [20, 21] require a large number of training data for estimating the underlying distribution which is an expensive process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likelihood ratio achieves optimal performance at all operating points on receiver operating characteristics (ROCs), provided the estimation of probability density functions for genuine and impostor distributions are accurate. Parametric density estimation methods [18, 19] assume some predefined model for genuine and impostor scores distribution which is not always accurate, whereas non‐parametric methods [20, 21] require a large number of training data for estimating the underlying distribution which is an expensive process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%