2017
DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2017.1343087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining multi-criteria and space syntax analysis to assess a pedestrian network: the case of Oporto

Abstract: This paper describes a GIS-based integrated approach to assess a pedestrian network by combining multi-criteria and space syntax. The analysis combines pedestrian attributes with street connectivity and both factors were evaluated by a group of experts. The approach was adopted in the city of Oporto. Results show that the city centre offers various conditions; however, overall they are poor for pedestrians. Moreover, the streets which scored best are not integrated into the network. The described approach can … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(139 reference statements)
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These tools-including the Survey on Conditions of Practicable Environments (SCOPE), the Public Open Space Desktop Audit Tool (POSDAT), the Pedestrian Environment Data Scan (PEDS), the Environmental Assessment of Public Recreation Spaces (EAPRS), and the Procedure and the Quality Index of Parks for Youth (QUINPY)) [45][46][47][48]-incorporate qualitative and quantitative indicators and sub-indicators and aggregate data collected from direct on-site observation and/or secondary data retrieved from informative territorial services, internet-based street-level imagery services (Google Street View), and territorial imagery services (Google Maps, Google Earth, Bing Maps). The combination of primary and secondary data, and of qualitative and quantitative indicators, is also central to multicriteria evaluation models [49][50][51][52]. These tools integrate spatial information related to macro-scale built environment factors and evaluation of micro-scale site-specific urban design features, reflecting a conceptualization of a place's inclusivity or usefulness as the product of both inherent and endowed contextual properties.…”
Section: Review Of Methodological Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tools-including the Survey on Conditions of Practicable Environments (SCOPE), the Public Open Space Desktop Audit Tool (POSDAT), the Pedestrian Environment Data Scan (PEDS), the Environmental Assessment of Public Recreation Spaces (EAPRS), and the Procedure and the Quality Index of Parks for Youth (QUINPY)) [45][46][47][48]-incorporate qualitative and quantitative indicators and sub-indicators and aggregate data collected from direct on-site observation and/or secondary data retrieved from informative territorial services, internet-based street-level imagery services (Google Street View), and territorial imagery services (Google Maps, Google Earth, Bing Maps). The combination of primary and secondary data, and of qualitative and quantitative indicators, is also central to multicriteria evaluation models [49][50][51][52]. These tools integrate spatial information related to macro-scale built environment factors and evaluation of micro-scale site-specific urban design features, reflecting a conceptualization of a place's inclusivity or usefulness as the product of both inherent and endowed contextual properties.…”
Section: Review Of Methodological Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This quality of accessibility compels us to consider urban design factors, microscale spatial features of the built environment, land-use patterns, and social factors as variables that influence individual practices and attitudes. Based on these theoretical premises, the analytical methods proposed by Garau and Pavan [22], Jabbari et al [38], Blecic et al [20,21], Moura et al [17], Talavera-Garcia and Soria-Lara [39], and Ewing and Handy [40,41] are thus regarded as valid contributions for selecting criteria and structuring the methodology for assessing practicability.…”
Section: Criteria For Evaluating the Practicability Of The Urban Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…References related to pedestrian activities, design networks and pedestrian accessibility had allowed to identify different factors, dimensions and criteria to improve pedestrian mobility. The main and more relevant ones are related to connectivity, urban function of the routes, route attributes, convenience, and the coexistence between pedestrian and other modes of transport (Blečić, Cecchini, Congiu, Fancello, & Trunfio, 2015;Jabbari et al, 2017;Moura et al, 2017). Some recent works involve stakeholders and decision-makers in the planning process of pedestrian mobility.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walking can be considered the basis of a sustainable city, providing social, environmental and economic benefits (Moura, Cambra, & Gonçalves, 2017). Encouraging people to walk have mainly concentrated on making it easy and attractive (Jabbari, Fonseca, & Ramos, 2017). Thus, the design of pedestrian routes and areas involves consideration of different technical, economic, environmental, and social factors (Sayyadi & Awasthi, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation