2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11242-015-0619-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Mercury Intrusion and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Measurements Using Percolation Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
71
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the laboratory NMR tests (water‐saturated porous media), the diffusion and bulk relaxation times (order of seconds) are much longer than the surface relaxation (order of milliseconds) . Therefore, surface relaxation ( T 2 S ) becomes the most critical mechanism affecting the NMR relaxation …”
Section: Samples and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the laboratory NMR tests (water‐saturated porous media), the diffusion and bulk relaxation times (order of seconds) are much longer than the surface relaxation (order of milliseconds) . Therefore, surface relaxation ( T 2 S ) becomes the most critical mechanism affecting the NMR relaxation …”
Section: Samples and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The T 2 value can be linked to pore size (Equation ) 1T2=1T2normalS=ρSV=ρar,in which ρ is the surface relaxivity (μm/ms) to convert the NMR T 2 to the pore‐size distribution, S (μm 2 ) and V (μm 3 ) are the pore surface area and pore volume, respectively, and a is the pore shape constant …”
Section: Samples and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For brine‐saturated rock samples, diffusion relaxation is minimized if small echo spacing is used (Daigle et al, ), yielding a negligible diffusion term in equation . For brine, the magnetization decay is sufficiently smaller than the surface relaxation rate in a porous media (Daigle & Johnson, ; Kleinberg & Horsfield, ); T 2 is dominated by T 2surface and can be simplified as 1T2ρSVp. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the pore structure of interest is highly heterogeneous, the calculated CPC may have an unacceptable error due to the unrepresentative pore structure. Additionally, direct numerical simulations on the reconstructed 3-D pore network models is a multistep process, including training experimental images, extracting pore or solid parameters, and building models, as well as numerical computation with a strong computer performance caused by the complex nature of porous media (Daigle & Johnson, 2016;Ferrari et al, 2015;Okabe & Blunt, 2004;Øren & Bakke, 2002;Shikhov & Arns, 2015;Wang & Pan, 2009). Thus, the numerical approach is not sufficiently economical for obtaining the CPC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%