2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2012.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining local wavelength information and ensemble learning to enhance the specificity of class modeling techniques: Identification of food geographical origins and adulteration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ensemble strategies, also called data fusion, consensus, multimodel, or population analysis in different research, have been combined with multivariate calibration, pattern recognition, calibration transfer, variable selection, outlier detection, preprocessing, and parameter selection in chemometrics. Among these methods, ensemble calibration is the hottest research topic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ensemble strategies, also called data fusion, consensus, multimodel, or population analysis in different research, have been combined with multivariate calibration, pattern recognition, calibration transfer, variable selection, outlier detection, preprocessing, and parameter selection in chemometrics. Among these methods, ensemble calibration is the hottest research topic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, several nonseparation/nondestructive techniques (e.g., isotope ratio mass spectrometry, infrared spectroscopy, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy) have been applied for the detection of adulterated sesame oils [1,4,6]. Previous studies have also employed techniques such as gas chromatography (GC) coupled with a flame ionization detector [7] or mass spectrometer [8,9], high performance liquid chromatography with a refractive index detector [10], an evaporative light scattering detector [5,11] or a fluorescence detector [12], an electronic nose [13], and realtime PCR [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to tackle the problem of food adulterations and frauds, both DA and CMTs have encountered some difficulties [10][11][12]. DA models are trained from two or more known classes, so their applications should be limited to predictions of objects from the predefined classes; otherwise, if a new object comes from an untrained class, the prediction would be unreliable or wrong [13]. In contrast, CMTs are trained using only the data of one class (e.g., PDO food to be controlled) and can answer the question of whether a future object is from the target class or not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%