2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining local fishers' and scientific ecological knowledge: Implications for comanagement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
6
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation contrasts with that made in Fiji, where older fishers tended to have a more pessimistic point of view about shellfish stock depletion (Bao and Drew, 2017). Our study shows the potential utility of local ecological knowledge (LEK) of fishers in understanding stock status in artisanal fisheries in which longitudinal data on catches are often lacking (Medeiros et al, 2018). The dramatic increase in participation rates that we report for Samoa's trochus fishery should be a concern and stricter management measures might be needed to ensure sustainability.…”
Section: Perspectives On Fishery Managementcontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…This observation contrasts with that made in Fiji, where older fishers tended to have a more pessimistic point of view about shellfish stock depletion (Bao and Drew, 2017). Our study shows the potential utility of local ecological knowledge (LEK) of fishers in understanding stock status in artisanal fisheries in which longitudinal data on catches are often lacking (Medeiros et al, 2018). The dramatic increase in participation rates that we report for Samoa's trochus fishery should be a concern and stricter management measures might be needed to ensure sustainability.…”
Section: Perspectives On Fishery Managementcontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…Studies with this social group have demonstrated that small-scale fishers apply LEK in their daily resource exploration practices and have relevant knowledge about the biology and ecology of fishery resources in their region (Silvano & Begossi 2012, Lima et al 2018, Medeiros et al 2018. The combination of this source of information with academic knowledge can result in more assertive management practices, as well as may create new hypotheses of studies, changing the scientific knowledge (Zappes et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors include water color, wind direction and current, lunar periodicity, sediments and topography, celestial navigation, birds and animals, mangroves and fishing sites. Grant and Berkes (2007) identified nine categories of knowledge, that are important for finding and catching large pelagic fish, including seasons, bait use, gear technology, weather conditions, fishing practices, fish habits and behavior, fish movements, "popular oceanography" (seabirds, seawater color, current), and fish stomach contents (Medeiros et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%