Digital Workplace Learning 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46215-8_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Learning Analytics with Job Market Intelligence to Support Learning at the Workplace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While standards for data models and data collection, such as xAPI (Experience API), exist (Kevan and Ryan 2016), learning analytics research and development need to clearly define standards for reliable and valid measures, informative visualisations, and design guidelines for pedagogically effective learning analytics interventions (Seufert et al 2019). In particular, personalised learning environments are increasingly in demand and are valued in higher education institutions for creating tailored learning packages optimised for each individual learner based on their personal profile, containing information such as their geo-and socio-demographic backgrounds (Lacave et al 2018), previous qualifications (Daud et al 2017), their engagement in the recruitment journey (Berg et al 2018), activities on websites (Seidel and Kutieleh 2017), and tracking information on their searches (Macfadyen and Dawson 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While standards for data models and data collection, such as xAPI (Experience API), exist (Kevan and Ryan 2016), learning analytics research and development need to clearly define standards for reliable and valid measures, informative visualisations, and design guidelines for pedagogically effective learning analytics interventions (Seufert et al 2019). In particular, personalised learning environments are increasingly in demand and are valued in higher education institutions for creating tailored learning packages optimised for each individual learner based on their personal profile, containing information such as their geo-and socio-demographic backgrounds (Lacave et al 2018), previous qualifications (Daud et al 2017), their engagement in the recruitment journey (Berg et al 2018), activities on websites (Seidel and Kutieleh 2017), and tracking information on their searches (Macfadyen and Dawson 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods need to be in place to co-develop these course objectives with the students, which require more flexible curricula. Nevertheless, the design of GS interventions may share some similarities with other educational approaches such as the use of e-Portfolios (Berg et al, 2018) to develop a 'learning journey'.…”
Section: Bottlenecks For Goal Setting In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it may be important to make the GS intervention part of the curriculum, so both students and educational institutions benefit from the positive outcomes (Schippers, 2020;Clonan et al, 2004). GS may be notably useful when learners are in a transitional period of their lives, as for instance progressing from school to higher education (Schippers & Ziegler 2019;Wilson, 2011), or from higher education to the labour market (Schippers, 2020;Berg et al, 2018). However the effects of making GS mandatory should be further investigated, as ownership is critical to the success of GS.…”
Section: Integrating Goal Setting In the Academic Programmentioning
confidence: 99%