2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Lean and Applied Research methods to improve rigor and efficiency in acute care outcomes research: A case study

Abstract: Hospital care is the single, largest contributor to health spending, yet evidence to guide value transformation is lacking. The large, real-world studies required to fill this void are challenging to conduct in the complex and fast-paced acute care environment. To address these challenges, we created a framework that combines Lean manufacturing methodology and Applied Research principles. We deployed this framework to design, pilot, and iteratively improve a study protocol testing the effectiveness of an innov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most assessed feasibility (8/16, 50%) [ 28 , 46 - 54 ], appropriateness (7/16, 43.8%) [ 28 , 41 , 44 - 46 , 52 , 54 , 55 ], acceptability (6/16, 37.5%) [ 28 , 44 - 46 , 52 , 56 ], and adoption (6/16, 37.5%) [ 28 , 35 , 45 , 46 , 57 , 58 ]. Less commonly studied implementation outcomes were implementation cost (3/16, 18.8%) [ 28 , 47 , 48 ], fidelity (2/16, 12.5%) [ 28 , 46 ], sustainability (1/16, 6.3%) [ 35 ], and penetration (1/16, 6.3%) [ 46 ]. This emphasis on the outcomes that are salient at earlier stages of implementation, such as the feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability of an LHS, highlights the burgeoning nature of the field, with few LHSs having progressed to questions around sustainability, penetration, and fidelity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most assessed feasibility (8/16, 50%) [ 28 , 46 - 54 ], appropriateness (7/16, 43.8%) [ 28 , 41 , 44 - 46 , 52 , 54 , 55 ], acceptability (6/16, 37.5%) [ 28 , 44 - 46 , 52 , 56 ], and adoption (6/16, 37.5%) [ 28 , 35 , 45 , 46 , 57 , 58 ]. Less commonly studied implementation outcomes were implementation cost (3/16, 18.8%) [ 28 , 47 , 48 ], fidelity (2/16, 12.5%) [ 28 , 46 ], sustainability (1/16, 6.3%) [ 35 ], and penetration (1/16, 6.3%) [ 46 ]. This emphasis on the outcomes that are salient at earlier stages of implementation, such as the feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability of an LHS, highlights the burgeoning nature of the field, with few LHSs having progressed to questions around sustainability, penetration, and fidelity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At MUMC+, lean, Six Sigma and rounding by hospital leaders led to a reduction in the number of delayed operations due to missing equipment by 68% (Edelman et al , 2017). This was an example of how lean methodology facilitated understanding care processes and areas of improvement, leading to more clearly defined and informed interventions (McWilliams et al , 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent push toward a value-based system drives new research aimed at understanding how to decrease or control the costs, while maintaining or improving the high-level quality of healthcare services (McWilliams et al, 2019). This is particularly true with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), where timeliness and responsiveness are key factors in treating patients effectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this frame, the adoption of quality improvement methodologies such as lean, six sigma or lean six sigma (LSS) presents multiple advantages in reaching efficacy and timeliness (McWilliams et al, 2019;Liberatore, 2013;Martens et al, 2014;Toledo et al, 2013). These methodologies are particularly suited to overcome the institution-related barriers affecting IV-tPA administration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation