2011
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining indoor residual spraying and insecticide-treated nets for malaria control in Africa: a review of possible outcomes and an outline of suggestions for the future

Abstract: Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) are currently the preferred methods of malaria vector control. In many cases, these methods are used together in the same households, especially to suppress transmission in holoendemic and hyperendemic scenarios. Though widespread, there has been limited evidence suggesting that such co-application confers greater protective benefits than either ITNs or IRS when used alone. Since both methods are insecticide-based and intradomicilliary, this ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
187
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
8
187
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LLISs are now promoted as a key method to fight malaria and its vector (Atkinson et al, 2009). Although the efficacy and potential of LLISs for wide applications is undisputed, their use has mostly been limited to controlling household pests and insect vectors such as mosquitoes and flies (Baume and Marin, 2008;Okumu and Moore, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LLISs are now promoted as a key method to fight malaria and its vector (Atkinson et al, 2009). Although the efficacy and potential of LLISs for wide applications is undisputed, their use has mostly been limited to controlling household pests and insect vectors such as mosquitoes and flies (Baume and Marin, 2008;Okumu and Moore, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today universal coverage with either LLIN or IRS is the major malaria prevention strategy and in many settings where IRS is used, LLIN are already deployed. Whilst the individual protection afforded by LLIN 3 and IRS 4 is well known, the joint impact of these interventions is poorly understood 5,6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While both interventions have considerably reduced disease morbidity when used alone [4,5] and in combination [6][7][8], problems of sustainability, increasing insecticide resistance and operational constraints now undermine movements towards malaria elimination [9][10][11]. In areas of stable or high transmission in sub-Saharan Africa, the infrastructure required to support large-scale, recurrent IRS campaigns of indefinite duration is not feasible [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%