2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining FLASH and spatially fractionated radiation therapy: The best of both worlds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A novel partial irradiation technique, spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT), can also induce an antitumor immune response. SFRT can deliver a high dose to a large irradiation field that is segmented into several small units with steep dose gradients, which lead to reduce the normal tissue toxicity ( 208 211 ). In the study of Johnsrud et al.…”
Section: Partial Irradiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A novel partial irradiation technique, spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT), can also induce an antitumor immune response. SFRT can deliver a high dose to a large irradiation field that is segmented into several small units with steep dose gradients, which lead to reduce the normal tissue toxicity ( 208 211 ). In the study of Johnsrud et al.…”
Section: Partial Irradiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatially-fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) and FLASH RT delivered at ultra-high dose rates (UHDRs) are two new non-standard radiotherapy techniques of great interest in modern oncology due to the distinct normal-tissue-sparing effects they can each elicit. Recent discussion has arisen on a possible synergy between the two techniques which could potentially result in the increase of their individual therapeutic windows (Schneider et al 2022). However, research on potential delivery methods to achieve the two tissue-sparing effects in deep-seated tumours simultaneously is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sub-second FLASH irradiations synergize well with spatially-fractionated techniques, given that loss of spatial fractionation often occurs as a result of organ motion due to treatment times longer than physiological motion. The normal tissue-sparing effects of FLASH RT and SFRT are thought to occur through different biological mechanisms (Schneider et al 2022) and thus have different physical and delivery requirements; as an example, SFRT does not seem to have the same requirements on the beam time structure, threshold dose, irradiation time, and tissue oxygen concentration that FLASH radiotherapy does (Dilmanian et al 2003, Adrian et al 2020, Vozenin et al 2020, Wilson et al 2020. Therefore, future studies using sources that are capable of spatially-fractionated and open beam UHDR irradiations could help determine the potential for combining the techniques and determining to what degree each technique contributes should the effects synergize (Wright et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRT exploits the dose-volume effect [7,8], a phenomenon in which mature biological tissues tolerate high microbeam doses in the order of hundreds of Gy better than broad beam doses of only a few Gy. MRT has shown remarkable results in numerous preclinical studies compared to conventional radiotherapy, thanks to increased tolerance of healthy tissues and increased effectiveness in limiting tumour development [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%