2002
DOI: 10.1139/x02-133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining environmentally dependent and independent analyses of witness tree data in east-central Alabama

Abstract: We reconstructed pre-European settlement forest composition across 13 000 km 2 of east-central Alabama using 43 610 witness trees recorded in the original Public Land Surveys. First, we interpolated the witness tree data to estimate broad-scale vegetation patterns. Next, we conducted species-site analysis on landforms, an approach that was dependent on underlying environmental variables yet better resolved fine-scale vegetation patterns. East-central Alabama was dominated by three community types: oak-hickory … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contingency table analysis has been used in several studies to analyze the relationship between PLS data and environmental factors (Whitney 1982, Whitney 1986, Leitner et al 1991, Black et al 2002, while others have used regression models (Iverson et al 1988, Batek et al 1999. We tallied the sections based on cover class and the associated environmental factor category.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis Of Cover Class Associations With Enviromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contingency table analysis has been used in several studies to analyze the relationship between PLS data and environmental factors (Whitney 1982, Whitney 1986, Leitner et al 1991, Black et al 2002, while others have used regression models (Iverson et al 1988, Batek et al 1999. We tallied the sections based on cover class and the associated environmental factor category.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis Of Cover Class Associations With Enviromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surveyors marked the corners of each section and defined section boundaries by recording witness trees that were in close proximity to the boundary markers. In the 1830s, when the federal government conducted land surveys in the Alabama portion of the area that would become Fort Benning, corner and witness trees were recorded (Foster, 2001;Black et al, 2002). Earlier, when the Georgia portion was surveyed in 1827, the land was divided into roughly equal lots within districts.…”
Section: Early Nineteenth Century Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others held biases in the species and sizes of trees selected as witness trees. It is often assumed that surveyors were biased towards longer living or larger trees when selecting witness trees (Black et al, 2002). In addition, some surveyors may have exaggerated the amounts of valuable timber species so that land values would be elevated.…”
Section: Early Nineteenth Century Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang (2005) and Mladenoff et al (2002) provide good reviews of the data. These witness tree point data have been used in interpolations and statistical clustering routines to reconstruct pre-European settlement forest species composition and structure across the Midwest, the Southeast and Eastern US, including Wisconsin (He, Mladenoff et al 2000;Radeloff et al 2000;Schulte et al 2002;Bollinger et al 2004); in Alabama (Black et al 2002;Rathbun and Black 2006); Minnesota (Friedman and Reich 2005); Michigan (Leahy and Pregitzer 2003); Pennsylvania (Black and Abrams 2001); West Virginia (Abrams and McCay 1996), and Southern Illinois (Anderson et al 2006). Other researchers have used the PLS data with archeological sites to examine Native American influence on pre-European settlement vegetation patterns (Black et al 2002;Foster et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%