2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining dual-continuum approach with diffusion wave model to include a preferential flow component in hillslope scale modeling of shallow subsurface runoff

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of α ws was also estimated to decrease linearly between the soil surface and the lower boundary, from 1 to 0.01 cm −1 d −1 , consistently with the decreasing hydraulic conductivity of the soil matrix. More details about the applied modeling approach and model assumptions can be found in previous studies of Vogel et al (2010b) and Dušek et al (2012).…”
Section: Modeling Hillslope Runoff Responses At Tomšovkamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of α ws was also estimated to decrease linearly between the soil surface and the lower boundary, from 1 to 0.01 cm −1 d −1 , consistently with the decreasing hydraulic conductivity of the soil matrix. More details about the applied modeling approach and model assumptions can be found in previous studies of Vogel et al (2010b) and Dušek et al (2012).…”
Section: Modeling Hillslope Runoff Responses At Tomšovkamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was a 2 m-high PVC pipe with the capacity of about 0.06 m 3 . The water level in the IP was set by adjusting in height the air-entry tube inlet of the bottle.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also Appels et al [37] measured topsoil K s,l values over 1900 mm·h −1 . Dusek et al [3] used K s,l values of several thousands of mm·h −1 to simulate water flow in macropores in the superficial soil layers in an experimental hillslope. The median K s,l value, 552 mm·h −1 (Table 3), of the B horizon of the monoliths (from 15 cm of depth to the restrictive layer), was about 78% lower than that of the A horizon.…”
Section: K Sl Values Of Individual Soil Horizonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations