2009
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291709990651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining dimensional and categorical representation of psychosis: the way forward for DSM-V and ICD-11?

Abstract: Categorical and dimensional representations of psychosis are complementary. Using both appears to be a promising strategy in conceptualising psychotic illnesses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
83
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(104 reference statements)
2
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using factor analysis, baseline symptoms were categorized into five psychopathological dimensions (manic, reality distortion, negative, depressive and disorganized) (Demjaha et al 2009). Age at onset was established as the age at which first psychotic symptoms appeared.…”
Section: Baseline Clinical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using factor analysis, baseline symptoms were categorized into five psychopathological dimensions (manic, reality distortion, negative, depressive and disorganized) (Demjaha et al 2009). Age at onset was established as the age at which first psychotic symptoms appeared.…”
Section: Baseline Clinical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The category of schizophrenia-type psychosis, confined to the most severely ill patients with poor outcome, may be beneficial in approximating need for care, outcome, course and treatment (Kendell & Jablensky, 2003). However, mounting evidence suggests that a transdiagnostic dimensional approach, complementary to the clinical utility of the categorical approach, may provide in-depth information that covers different aspects of psychopathology beyond the borders of the modern operationalized criteria (Demjaha et al 2009;Russo et al 2014;van Os & Reininghaus, 2016). One of the clinically-derived arguments for Kraepelinian dichotomy is that patients with bipolar disorder respond to lithium, whereas patients with non-affective psychosis do not.…”
Section: Transdiagnostic Psychosis Manifestationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, we have recently proposed exactly this 8 . This does have some empirical support, in that adding symptom factor scores to diagnostic categories has been shown to significantly increase the amount of variability explained in predicting, among other things, duration of untreated psychosis 9 . The reverse approach, of adding categories to continua, as van Os and Reininghaus seem to propose, fared less well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%