2012
DOI: 10.1186/1687-6180-2012-167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining data fusion with multiresolution analysis for improving the classification accuracy of uterine EMG signals

Abstract: Multisensor data fusion is a powerful solution for solving difficult pattern recognition problems such as the classification of bioelectrical signals. It is the process of combining information from different sensors to provide a more stable and more robust classification decisions. We combine here data fusion with multiresolution analysis based on the wavelet packet transform (WPT) in order to classify real uterine electromyogram (EMG) signals recorded by 16 electrodes. Herein, the data fusion is done at the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The temporal parameters measuring the intensity of contraction intervals were: signal amplitude, area under contraction curve, and root mean square (RMS) value [ 7 , 8 ]. The spectral parameters estimating shifts and amplitude changes of the power spectrum during pregnancy were: peak, median, or dominant frequency of the power spectrum [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ], normalized peak amplitude of the power spectrum [ 5 ], wavelets [ 13 , 20 , 21 , 22 ], and autoregressive coefficients [ 20 , 23 ]. Non-linear parameters estimate regularity, predictability, periodicity, the amount of chaos, and the complexity of a time series.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temporal parameters measuring the intensity of contraction intervals were: signal amplitude, area under contraction curve, and root mean square (RMS) value [ 7 , 8 ]. The spectral parameters estimating shifts and amplitude changes of the power spectrum during pregnancy were: peak, median, or dominant frequency of the power spectrum [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ], normalized peak amplitude of the power spectrum [ 5 ], wavelets [ 13 , 20 , 21 , 22 ], and autoregressive coefficients [ 20 , 23 ]. Non-linear parameters estimate regularity, predictability, periodicity, the amount of chaos, and the complexity of a time series.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches to classifying individual pregnancy and labor contraction bursts incorporated the following features: Root Mean Square (RMS) value [ 6 , 16 ]; amplitude and area under contraction curve [ 16 ]; contraction power [ 16 ]; peak frequency of power spectrum [ 10 , 17 19 ]; mean frequency, peak frequency, and median frequency of power spectrum [ 16 , 19 21 ]; mean power frequency [ 22 ]; EHG propagation velocity [ 10 , 17 ]; wavelets [ 11 ] [ 20 , 23 , 24 ]; autoregressive (AR) coefficients [ 23 ]; time reversibility [ 20 22 ]; sample entropy and Lyapunov exponent [ 19 21 ]; variance entropy [ 20 ]; delay vector variance [ 21 ]; approximate entropy [ 22 ]; non-linear correlation coefficient [ 25 ]; and intrinsic mode functions using Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) [ 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shift of the spectrum of uterine bursts towards higher frequencies as labor approaches was reported [ 4 , 11 , 12 ]. Therefore, many other methods used a wider frequency band expanding above 1.0 Hz, 0.3-3.0 Hz [ 27 , 30 , 34 36 ], 0.1-3.0 Hz [ 20 , 24 , 26 ], 0.3-4.0 Hz [ 27 , 33 ], 0.2-8.0 Hz [ 23 ], 0.05-16.0 Hz [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 1 shows the frequency bands of preprocessing bandpass filters used in the previous studies on uterine EMG, which shows there is no globally accepted frequency band for prefiltering. Garfield et al and Lucovnik et al used a frequency band as narrow as 0.34-1 Hz, while many other studies used broader bands like 0.05-1.5 Hz, 0.1-3 Hz, 0.34-3 Hz, 0.08-4 Hz, 0.1-4 Hz, 0.2-8 Hz, and 0.3-50 Hz [7,12,13,[19][20][21]26]. Moreover, different research groups used prefilters of different frequency bands for the analysis of the same database.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%