2021
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.682925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Clinicopathological Parameters and Molecular Indicators to Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Endometrioid Type Endometrial Adenocarcinoma

Abstract: BackgroundLymph node metastasis (LNM) is a critical unfavorable prognostic factor in endometrial cancer (EC). At present, models involving molecular indicators that accurately predict LNM are still uncommon. We addressed this gap by developing nomograms to individualize the risk of LNM in EC and to identify a low-risk group for LNM.MethodsIn all, 776 patients who underwent comprehensive surgical staging with pelvic lymphadenectomy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were divided in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, CA125 and CA153 were confirmed to be independent risk factors for LNM in EC patients in our study, which was consistent with previous studies. [31][32][33] Moreover, our study combined the SII, CA125, CA153 and LVSI to significantly improve the efficacy of predicting LNM in EC patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, CA125 and CA153 were confirmed to be independent risk factors for LNM in EC patients in our study, which was consistent with previous studies. [31][32][33] Moreover, our study combined the SII, CA125, CA153 and LVSI to significantly improve the efficacy of predicting LNM in EC patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous models used traditional clinicopathological characteristics including LVSI, myometrial invasion, histotype, grade, age, and/or BMI (11,12). So far, results were only moderate and, currently, additional immunohistochemical markers are already frequently used in the clinic: ER, PR, L1CAM, p53, Ki67 (13,14). Some authors also included imaging information such as tumor diameter, myometrial/cervical invasion, or lymphadenopathy (15,16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predictive accuracy according to the discrimination of the AUC criteria was 0.64 for the nomogram. Recently, several studies have managed to combine clinicopathological parameters and molecular indicators to predict lymph node metastasis in EEC ( 20 , 26 29 ). It was showed that incorporating molecular indicators can predict lymph node metastasis more accurately ( 20 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several studies have managed to combine clinicopathological parameters and molecular indicators to predict lymph node metastasis in EEC ( 20 , 26 29 ). It was showed that incorporating molecular indicators can predict lymph node metastasis more accurately ( 20 ). However, POLE and MMR are important parameters in the molecular-based classification introduced by TCGA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%